Advertisement
ALPMF vs AZNCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALPMF is a Hold and AZNCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALPMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAZNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ALPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AZNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALPMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AZNCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALPMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- AZNCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ALPMF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while AZNCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +0.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+1.12% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| ALPMF | AZNCF | ALPMF / AZNCF | |
| Capitalization | 24.1B | 286B | 8% |
| EBITDA | 347B | 18B | 1,928% |
| Gain YTD | 33.367 | 39.442 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.55 | 30.11 | 98% |
| Revenue | 2.01T | 58.1B | 3,454% |
| Total Cash | 296B | 8.18B | 3,618% |
| Total Debt | 741B | 32.6B | 2,273% |
ALPMF | AZNCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALPMF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as AZNCF (24). This means that ALPMF’s stock grew similarly to AZNCF’s over the last 12 months.
AZNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALPMF (100). This means that AZNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
AZNCF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALPMF (100). This means that AZNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
ALPMF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as AZNCF (42). This means that ALPMF’s stock grew similarly to AZNCF’s over the last 12 months.
AZNCF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALPMF (92). This means that AZNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALPMF’s over the last 12 months.
| ALPMF | AZNCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PTIN | 32.60 | 0.07 | +0.20% |
| Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | |||
| CPLB | 21.32 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
| EAOR | 35.60 | 0.05 | +0.13% |
| iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Bal Allc ETF | |||
| IWY | 281.03 | 0.19 | +0.07% |
| iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | |||
| BSJR | 22.60 | N/A | -0.02% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2027 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
ALPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALPMF has been loosely correlated with ALPMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALPMF jumps, then ALPMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALPMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALPMY - ALPMF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| JNJ - ALPMF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| GRFS - ALPMF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| AZNCF - ALPMF | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ABBV - ALPMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
AZNCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZNCF has been loosely correlated with AZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZNCF jumps, then AZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZNCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZNCF | 100% | -2.75% | ||
| AZN - AZNCF | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| NVS - AZNCF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNY - AZNCF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| MRK - AZNCF | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| BAYRY - AZNCF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||