ALMS
Price
$4.05
Change
+$0.06 (+1.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
421.46M
46 days until earnings call
FULC
Price
$8.84
Change
+$0.34 (+4.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
478.17M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALMS vs FULC

Header iconALMS vs FULC Comparison
Open Charts ALMS vs FULCBanner chart's image
Alumis
Price$4.05
Change+$0.06 (+1.50%)
Volume$852.27K
Capitalization421.46M
Fulcrum Therapeutics
Price$8.84
Change+$0.34 (+4.00%)
Volume$605.61K
Capitalization478.17M
ALMS vs FULC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALMS vs. FULC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALMS is a Hold and FULC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ALMS: $4.05 vs. FULC: $8.84)
Brand notoriety: ALMS and FULC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALMS: 127% vs. FULC: 92%
Market capitalization -- ALMS: $421.46M vs. FULC: $478.17M
ALMS [@Biotechnology] is valued at $421.46M. FULC’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $478.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $98.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFULC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULC is a better buy in the long-term than ALMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FULC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULC is a better buy in the short-term than ALMS.

Price Growth

ALMS (@Biotechnology) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while FULC (@Biotechnology) price change was +19.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +4.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

FULC is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+4.00% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULC($478M) has a higher market cap than ALMS($421M). FULC YTD gains are higher at: 88.085 vs. ALMS (-48.473). FULC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -81.28M vs. ALMS (-435.74M). ALMS has more cash in the bank: 486M vs. FULC (214M). FULC has less debt than ALMS: FULC (7.57M) vs ALMS (38.8M). ALMS has higher revenues than FULC: ALMS (20.1M) vs FULC (0).
ALMSFULCALMS / FULC
Capitalization421M478M88%
EBITDA-435.74M-81.28M536%
Gain YTD-48.47388.085-55%
P/E Ratio0.12N/A-
Revenue20.1M0-
Total Cash486M214M227%
Total Debt38.8M7.57M512%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULC: Fundamental Ratings
FULC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALMSFULC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEVAX16.690.20
+1.21%
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity A
MAMEX21.950.23
+1.06%
MoA Mid Cap Equity Index Fund
GDSRX27.870.25
+0.91%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R
IJEMX12.90N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity I
FIQCX30.31N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Z

ALMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALMS and ADAP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALMS and ADAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALMS
1D Price
Change %
ALMS100%
+1.50%
ADAP - ALMS
30%
Poorly correlated
+15.75%
SLNO - ALMS
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
ATXS - ALMS
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
ZBIO - ALMS
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
FULC - ALMS
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
More

FULC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULC has been loosely correlated with TRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FULC jumps, then TRDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULC
1D Price
Change %
FULC100%
+4.00%
TRDA - FULC
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
ADPT - FULC
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
OCUL - FULC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
BEAM - FULC
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
VRDN - FULC
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.82%
More