Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALMCX vs NRGSX
ALMCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ALMCX vs NRGSX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth C
Price$7.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.35M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
ALMCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALMCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALMCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. ALMCX (327M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ALMCX: NRGSX (0.06) vs ALMCX (0.00). ALMCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ALMCX (23 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ALMCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ALMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.68 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALMCX: NRGSX (0) vs ALMCX (1000). ALMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.66 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. ALMCX (-42.10).
| ALMCX | NRGSX | ALMCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.74 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.74 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.049 | -3.902 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327M | 8.71B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.66 | -10.12 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.30 | 5.90 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.10 | -2.32 | 1,814% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.28 | 10.24 | -491% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers