ALM
Price
$4.48
Change
-$0.23 (-4.88%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
966.79M
BLTH
Price
$4.01
Change
-$2.69 (-40.15%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALM vs BLTH

Header iconALM vs BLTH Comparison
Open Charts ALM vs BLTHBanner chart's image
Almonty Industries
Price$4.48
Change-$0.23 (-4.88%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization966.79M
American Battery Materials
Price$4.01
Change-$2.69 (-40.15%)
Volume$309
Capitalization1.74M
ALM vs BLTH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BLTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALM vs. BLTH commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALM is a Hold and BLTH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ALM: $4.48 vs. BLTH: $4.01)
Brand notoriety: ALM and BLTH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALM: 154% vs. BLTH: 48%
Market capitalization -- ALM: $966.79M vs. BLTH: $1.74M
ALM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $966.79M. BLTH’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBLTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BLTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLTH is a better buy in the long-term than ALM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLTH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BLTH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALM is a better buy in the short-term than BLTH.

Price Growth

ALM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.74% price change this week, while BLTH (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -40.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALM($967M) has a higher market cap than BLTH($1.74M). ALM YTD gains are higher at: 378.058 vs. BLTH (25.313).
ALMBLTHALM / BLTH
Capitalization967M1.74M55,511%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD378.05825.3131,494%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A3.23K-
Total DebtN/A4.07M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALM vs BLTH: Fundamental Ratings
ALM
BLTH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8515

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLTH's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALM (93). This means that BLTH’s stock grew significantly faster than ALM’s over the last 12 months.

BLTH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ALM (100). This means that BLTH’s stock grew similarly to ALM’s over the last 12 months.

BLTH's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ALM (100). This means that BLTH’s stock grew similarly to ALM’s over the last 12 months.

ALM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BLTH (64). This means that ALM’s stock grew similarly to BLTH’s over the last 12 months.

ALM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLTH (100). This means that ALM’s stock grew similarly to BLTH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALMBLTH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BLTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSEMX16.200.04
+0.25%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Y
NPNEX49.31-0.06
-0.12%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value E
STMSX23.56-0.13
-0.55%
SEI Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap F (SIMT)
EGLNX10.40-0.06
-0.57%
Eagle Energy Infrastructure N
WSCVX15.16-0.10
-0.66%
North Star Small Cap Value Investor

ALM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALM and XPL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALM and XPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALM
1D Price
Change %
ALM100%
-4.88%
XPL - ALM
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
NAK - ALM
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
SKE - ALM
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
TECK - ALM
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
VZLA - ALM
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

BLTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLTH has been loosely correlated with OMEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLTH jumps, then OMEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLTH
1D Price
Change %
BLTH100%
N/A
OMEX - BLTH
39%
Loosely correlated
-8.59%
NVA - BLTH
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
GTI - BLTH
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ALM - BLTH
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
BATXF - BLTH
1%
Poorly correlated
-7.88%
More