ALL
Price
$206.38
Change
-$2.24 (-1.07%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.59B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAFT
Price
$74.92
Change
-$1.20 (-1.58%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.13B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALL vs SAFT

Header iconALL vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts ALL vs SAFTBanner chart's image
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$206.38
Change-$2.24 (-1.07%)
Volume$22.51K
Capitalization54.59B
Safety Insurance Group
Price$74.92
Change-$1.20 (-1.58%)
Volume$2.07K
Capitalization1.13B
ALL vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALL vs. SAFT commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a StrongBuy and SAFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ALL: $208.62 vs. SAFT: $76.12)
Brand notoriety: ALL and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 128% vs. SAFT: 94%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $54.59B vs. SAFT: $1.13B
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $54.59B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.45% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.07% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($54.6B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.13B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than ALL: SAFT (12.97) vs ALL (6.76). ALL YTD gains are higher at: 9.817 vs. SAFT (-4.291). ALL has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. SAFT (611M). SAFT has less debt than ALL: SAFT (43.7M) vs ALL (8.09B). ALL has higher revenues than SAFT: ALL (66.2B) vs SAFT (1.19B).
ALLSAFTALL / SAFT
Capitalization54.6B1.13B4,815%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.817-4.291-229%
P/E Ratio6.7612.9752%
Revenue66.2B1.19B5,558%
Total Cash10.6B611M1,735%
Total Debt8.09B43.7M18,506%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
755
SMR RATING
1..100
9470
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9271
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (49). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (55). This means that ALL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (70) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (94). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (52). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (92). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZCOX10.220.20
+2.00%
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
BASAX21.550.28
+1.32%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Adv
NRLCX53.600.54
+1.02%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R6
HLMEX20.980.06
+0.29%
Harding Loevner Instl Emerg Mrkts I
FCANX12.680.03
+0.24%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
-0.14%
HIG - ALL
82%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
L - ALL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
TRV - ALL
77%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
THG - ALL
77%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
CNA - ALL
76%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
More

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.21%
CNA - SAFT
66%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
HIG - SAFT
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
CINF - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
THG - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
ALL - SAFT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More