ALL
Price
$195.70
Change
+$1.76 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
45.51B
3 days until earnings call
L
Price
$91.66
Change
+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALL vs L

Header iconALL vs L Comparison
Open Charts ALL vs LBanner chart's image
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$195.70
Change+$1.76 (+0.91%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization45.51B
Loews
Price$91.66
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Volume$436.66K
Capitalization17.4B
ALL vs L Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALL vs. L commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a StrongBuy and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ALL: $195.70 vs. L: $91.66)
Brand notoriety: ALL and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 90% vs. L: 51%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $45.51B vs. L: $17.4B
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $45.51B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $17.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than ALL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than ALL.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($45.5B) has a higher market cap than L($17.4B). ALL has higher P/E ratio than L: ALL (40.00) vs L (12.32). L YTD gains are higher at: 8.386 vs. ALL (2.510). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. ALL (5.87B). ALL has less debt than L: ALL (7.94B) vs L (9B). ALL has higher revenues than L: ALL (57.1B) vs L (15.7B).
ALLLALL / L
Capitalization45.5B17.4B261%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.5108.38630%
P/E Ratio40.0012.32325%
Revenue57.1B15.7B364%
Total Cash5.87B45.2B13%
Total Debt7.94B9B88%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs L: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2629
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3231
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9724
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALL's Valuation (67) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (70). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (8). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's SMR Rating (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (32). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALL (97). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAS177.413.73
+2.15%
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF
BRNY45.740.19
+0.43%
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
GBUY37.89N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
MYMI24.29N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2029 Municipal Bond ETF
DUST22.84-0.43
-1.85%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X ETF

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
+0.91%
HIG - ALL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
L - ALL
75%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
CINF - ALL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
CB - ALL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
THG - ALL
71%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.44%
CNA - L
86%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
TRV - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More