ALL
Price
$211.16
Change
+$1.95 (+0.93%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.75B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$104.38
Change
+$0.34 (+0.33%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.5B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALL vs L

Header iconALL vs L Comparison
Open Charts ALL vs LBanner chart's image
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$211.16
Change+$1.95 (+0.93%)
Volume$8.12K
Capitalization54.75B
Loews
Price$104.38
Change+$0.34 (+0.33%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization21.5B
ALL vs L Comparison Chart in %
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALL vs. L commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a Buy and L is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ALL: $209.21 vs. L: $104.04)
Brand notoriety: ALL and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 70% vs. L: 74%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $54.75B vs. L: $21.5B
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $54.75B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $21.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than ALL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than ALL.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +7.42% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.85% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($54.7B) has a higher market cap than L($21.5B). L has higher P/E ratio than ALL: L (15.08) vs ALL (6.78). L YTD gains are higher at: 23.105 vs. ALL (10.128). ALL has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. L (6.51B). ALL has less debt than L: ALL (8.09B) vs L (8.95B). ALL has higher revenues than L: ALL (66.2B) vs L (17.8B).
ALLLALL / L
Capitalization54.7B21.5B254%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.12823.10544%
P/E Ratio6.7815.0845%
Revenue66.2B17.8B372%
Total Cash10.6B6.51B163%
Total Debt8.09B8.95B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs L: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
822
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5428
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALL's Valuation (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (74). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (7). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's SMR Rating (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (54). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALL (92). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYEE28.860.02
+0.07%
Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF
MBBB21.81N/A
N/A
VanEck Mdy's Aly BBB Corp Bd ETF
BKCG36.39-0.02
-0.05%
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF
EBND21.26-0.02
-0.09%
SPDR® Blmbg Em Mkts Lcl Bd ETF
ETCG8.19-0.28
-3.35%
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
+0.89%
HIG - ALL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
TRV - ALL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
THG - ALL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
L - ALL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
CNA - ALL
76%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.29%
HIG - L
87%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
TRV - L
79%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More