ALL
Price
$209.05
Change
-$0.50 (-0.24%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
54.7B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$107.33
Change
-$0.18 (-0.17%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.18B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALL vs L

Header iconALL vs L Comparison
Open Charts ALL vs LBanner chart's image
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$209.05
Change-$0.50 (-0.24%)
Volume$411.36K
Capitalization54.7B
Loews
Price$107.33
Change-$0.18 (-0.17%)
Volume$323.55K
Capitalization22.18B
ALL vs L Comparison Chart in %
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALL vs. L commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a StrongBuy and L is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ALL: $209.05 vs. L: $107.33)
Brand notoriety: ALL and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 27% vs. L: 40%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $54.7B vs. L: $22.18B
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $54.7B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $22.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $18.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than ALL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than ALL.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.75% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($54.7B) has a higher market cap than L($22.2B). L has higher P/E ratio than ALL: L (15.56) vs ALL (6.78). L YTD gains are higher at: 26.998 vs. ALL (10.043). ALL has more cash in the bank: 9.67B vs. L (7.22B). ALL has less debt than L: ALL (8.09B) vs L (9.44B). ALL has higher revenues than L: ALL (66.2B) vs L (18B).
ALLLALL / L
Capitalization54.7B22.2B246%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.04326.99837%
P/E Ratio6.7815.5644%
Revenue66.2B18B368%
Total Cash9.67B7.22B134%
Total Debt8.09B9.44B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs L: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
777
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5424
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9217
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALL's Valuation (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (73). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (9). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's SMR Rating (93) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (54). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALL (92). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJS115.680.62
+0.54%
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
ONEV134.870.55
+0.41%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Russell 1000 LwVolFocETF
BLES43.550.11
+0.25%
Inspire Global Hope ETF
ZJUN26.830.01
+0.04%
Innovator Equity Dfnd Prot ETF -1 YrJune
RFCI22.57N/A
N/A
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
-0.24%
HIG - ALL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
L - ALL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
THG - ALL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
TRV - ALL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
CNA - ALL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.17%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CINF - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
ALL - L
78%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
More