ALL
Price
$201.53
Change
-$6.80 (-3.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
53.1B
59 days until earnings call
CNFR
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.01 (-1.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.04M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALL vs CNFR

Header iconALL vs CNFR Comparison
Open Charts ALL vs CNFRBanner chart's image
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$201.53
Change-$6.80 (-3.26%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization53.1B
Conifer Holdings
Price$0.74
Change-$0.01 (-1.33%)
Volume$4.57K
Capitalization9.04M
ALL vs CNFR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALL vs. CNFR commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a Hold and CNFR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ALL: $201.53 vs. CNFR: $0.74)
Brand notoriety: ALL and CNFR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 99% vs. CNFR: 53%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $53.1B vs. CNFR: $9.04M
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $53.1B. CNFR’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $9.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNFR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNFR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the long-term than CNFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNFR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNFR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the short-term than CNFR.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while CNFR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -5.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

CNFR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($53.1B) has a higher market cap than CNFR($9.05M). ALL YTD gains are higher at: 6.085 vs. CNFR (-36.752). CNFR has less debt than ALL: CNFR (12.1M) vs ALL (8.09B).
ALLCNFRALL / CNFR
Capitalization53.1B9.05M587,065%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.085-36.752-17%
P/E Ratio9.48N/A-
RevenueN/A52M-
Total CashN/A110M-
Total Debt8.09B12.1M66,835%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs CNFR: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
CNFR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8392
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
959
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5884
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALL's Valuation (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNFR (62). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNFR (100). This means that ALL’s stock grew significantly faster than CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

CNFR's SMR Rating (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALL (95). This means that CNFR’s stock grew significantly faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNFR (84). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

CNFR's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (92). This means that CNFR’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLCNFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UGL40.510.91
+2.30%
ProShares Ultra Gold
GHYG46.360.17
+0.37%
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bd ETF
EDGF25.030.04
+0.18%
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
APRJ24.930.03
+0.12%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Apr
DFUS70.50-0.16
-0.23%
Dimensional US Equity Market ETF

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
-3.26%
L - ALL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
ORI - ALL
74%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
CB - ALL
74%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
TRV - ALL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
CINF - ALL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
More

CNFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNFR and MSADF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNFR and MSADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNFR
1D Price
Change %
CNFR100%
-1.33%
MSADF - CNFR
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
ALL - CNFR
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
NODK - CNFR
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
TRUP - CNFR
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
DGICB - CNFR
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More