ALIT
Price
$7.89
Change
-$0.53 (-6.29%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
96 days until earnings call
SFSVF
Price
$89.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

ALIT vs SFSVF

Header iconALIT vs SFSVF Comparison
Open Charts ALIT vs SFSVFBanner chart's image
Alight
Price$7.89
Change-$0.53 (-6.29%)
Volume$9.86M
CapitalizationN/A
Software Service
Price$89.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
ALIT vs SFSVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALIT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALIT vs. SFSVF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALIT is a Hold and SFSVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ALIT: $7.89 vs. SFSVF: $89.00)
Brand notoriety: ALIT and SFSVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALIT: 215% vs. SFSVF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALIT: $5.36B vs. SFSVF: $380.86M
ALIT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.36B. SFSVF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $380.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALIT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFSVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSVF is a better buy in the long-term than ALIT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALIT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALIT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ALIT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.62% price change this week, while SFSVF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALIT is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALIT($5.36B) has a higher market cap than SFSVF($381M). SFSVF YTD gains are higher at: 38.070 vs. ALIT (-7.503). SFSVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.28B vs. ALIT (186M). SFSVF has more cash in the bank: 8.97B vs. ALIT (358M). SFSVF has less debt than ALIT: SFSVF (0) vs ALIT (2.92B). SFSVF has higher revenues than ALIT: SFSVF (31.1B) vs ALIT (3.41B).
ALITSFSVFALIT / SFSVF
Capitalization5.36B381M1,408%
EBITDA186M6.28B3%
Gain YTD-7.50338.070-20%
P/E RatioN/A12.63-
Revenue3.41B31.1B11%
Total Cash358M8.97B4%
Total Debt2.92B0-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALIT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALIT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ALIT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALIT has been loosely correlated with RPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALIT jumps, then RPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALIT
1D Price
Change %
ALIT100%
-6.29%
RPD - ALIT
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
SHOP - ALIT
53%
Loosely correlated
-5.22%
DV - ALIT
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
ZI - ALIT
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
DH - ALIT
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More

SFSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSVF
1D Price
Change %
SFSVF100%
N/A
CRWRF - SFSVF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SWDAF - SFSVF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMOAF - SFSVF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALIT - SFSVF
36%
Loosely correlated
-6.29%
WORX - SFSVF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
More