ALHC
Price
$21.75
Change
+$0.83 (+3.97%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEGXF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.08 (+40.00%)
Updated
Dec 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALHC vs NEGXF

Header iconALHC vs NEGXF Comparison
Open Charts ALHC vs NEGXFBanner chart's image
Alignment Healthcare
Price$21.75
Change+$0.83 (+3.97%)
Volume$5.51M
Capitalization4.35B
Nexgenrx
Price$0.28
Change+$0.08 (+40.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization19.46M
ALHC vs NEGXF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALHC vs. NEGXF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALHC is a Hold and NEGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ALHC: $21.75 vs. NEGXF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: ALHC and NEGXF are both not notable
ALHC represents the Managed Health Care, while NEGXF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALHC: 214% vs. NEGXF: 79%
Market capitalization -- ALHC: $4.35B vs. NEGXF: $19.46M
ALHC [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $4.35B. NEGXF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $19.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $303.42B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $35.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $49.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $1.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEGXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEGXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEGXF is a better buy in the long-term than ALHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEGXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NEGXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ALHC and NEGXF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ALHC (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +3.89% price change this week, while NEGXF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+1.11% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.93% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALHC($4.35B) has a higher market cap than NEGXF($19.5M). ALHC YTD gains are higher at: 10.101 vs. NEGXF (0.000). ALHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29M vs. NEGXF (3.12M). ALHC has more cash in the bank: 644M vs. NEGXF (2.54M). NEGXF has less debt than ALHC: NEGXF (415K) vs ALHC (330M). ALHC has higher revenues than NEGXF: ALHC (3.64B) vs NEGXF (17.7M).
ALHCNEGXFALHC / NEGXF
Capitalization4.35B19.5M22,313%
EBITDA29M3.12M930%
Gain YTD10.1010.000-
P/E RatioN/A24.30-
Revenue3.64B17.7M20,548%
Total Cash644M2.54M25,334%
Total Debt330M415K79,518%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEGXF: Fundamental Ratings
NEGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALHCNEGXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEGXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STTK4.730.22
+4.88%
Shattuck Labs
TOP1.030.02
+1.98%
TOP Financial Group Limited
EXLS42.480.80
+1.92%
ExlService Holdings
PEP145.922.44
+1.70%
PepsiCo
CTOS6.31-0.05
-0.79%
Custom Truck One Source

ALHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALHC has been loosely correlated with HUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALHC jumps, then HUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALHC
1D Price
Change %
ALHC100%
+3.94%
HUM - ALHC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
UNH - ALHC
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
ELV - ALHC
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
MOH - ALHC
33%
Loosely correlated
+4.39%
CVS - ALHC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More

NEGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEGXF and ALHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEGXF and ALHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEGXF
1D Price
Change %
NEGXF100%
N/A
ALHC - NEGXF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
OSCR - NEGXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
NEUE - NEGXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFHO - NEGXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%