Advertisement
ALFNF vs EPOW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALFNF is a Hold and EPOW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALFNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEPOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ALFNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- EPOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALFNF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPOW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALFNF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EPOW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
ALFNF (@Electrical Products) experienced а -10.69% price change this week, while EPOW (@Electrical Products) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.93%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (+1.73% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| ALFNF | EPOW | ALFNF / EPOW | |
| Capitalization | 297M | 24M | 1,238% |
| EBITDA | -4.19M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.889 | 3.069 | 192% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.37 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 488M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 17.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 49.7M | N/A | - |
| ALFNF | EPOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 17% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 7% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 2% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PBSRX | 14.91 | 0.05 | +0.34% |
| Polen US Small Company Growth Investor | |||
| MSFHX | 19.74 | 0.05 | +0.25% |
| MFS Total Return R3 | |||
| SKSZX | 29.17 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Z | |||
| SFMIX | 42.33 | -0.28 | -0.66% |
| American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5 | |||
| CLSPX | 31.45 | -0.46 | -1.44% |
| Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I | |||
ALFNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ALFNF and PCELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALFNF and PCELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALFNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALFNF | 100% | -10.69% | ||
| PCELF - ALFNF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EPOW - ALFNF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| NEOV - ALFNF | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.82% | ||
| HMFAF - ALFNF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| VLXGF - ALFNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
EPOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EPOW and FLUX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EPOW and FLUX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPOW | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| FLUX - EPOW | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| DFLI - EPOW | 20% Poorly correlated | -9.85% | ||
| EOSE - EPOW | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.90% | ||
| POLA - EPOW | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.75% | ||
| LTBR - EPOW | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||