ALF
Price
$10.56
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
379.5M
SZZL
Price
$10.08
Change
-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
315.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALF vs SZZL

Header iconALF vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts ALF vs SZZLBanner chart's image
Centurion Acquisition
Price$10.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$243
Capitalization379.5M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Volume$227
Capitalization315.17M
ALF vs SZZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALF vs. SZZL commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALF is a Buy and SZZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ALF: $10.56 vs. SZZL: $10.08)
Brand notoriety: ALF and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALF: 0% vs. SZZL: 0%
Market capitalization -- ALF: $379.5M vs. SZZL: $315.17M
ALF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $379.5M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $315.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.9M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZZL is a better buy in the long-term than ALF.

Price Growth

ALF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.93% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALF($380M) has a higher market cap than SZZL($315M). SZZL has more cash in the bank: 1.12M vs. ALF (423K).
ALFSZZLALF / SZZL
Capitalization380M315M121%
EBITDA-625.11KN/A-
Gain YTD4.554N/A-
P/E Ratio24.00N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash423K1.12M38%
Total DebtN/A262K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIVRX36.16N/A
N/A
Riverbridge Growth Investor
IASTX24.68N/A
N/A
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R6
GRHIX18.16N/A
N/A
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Instl
MUTHX26.78N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares Z
RFISX17.65N/A
N/A
Ranger Small Cap Institutional

ALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALF and GRAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALF and GRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALF
1D Price
Change %
ALF100%
+0.09%
GRAF - ALF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
ISRLU - ALF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBMC - ALF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
SZZL - ALF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
ATMC - ALF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SZZL and ALF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZZL and ALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
-0.49%
ALF - SZZL
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
CUB - SZZL
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHIC - SZZL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEP - SZZL
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
PORT - SZZL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More