ALDVF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.06 (-21.43%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.31M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HGMCF
Price
$19.42
Change
-$0.08 (-0.41%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALDVF vs HGMCF

Header iconALDVF vs HGMCF Comparison
Open Charts ALDVF vs HGMCFBanner chart's image
KIPLIN METALS
Price$0.22
Change-$0.06 (-21.43%)
Volume$500
Capitalization3.31M
Harmony Gold Mining
Price$19.42
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
Volume$760
Capitalization12.16B
ALDVF vs HGMCF Comparison Chart in %
ALDVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALDVF vs. HGMCF commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALDVF is a Hold and HGMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ALDVF: $0.22 vs. HGMCF: $19.42)
Brand notoriety: ALDVF and HGMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALDVF: 31% vs. HGMCF: 176%
Market capitalization -- ALDVF: $3.31M vs. HGMCF: $12.16B
ALDVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.31M. HGMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALDVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHGMCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALDVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HGMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the long-term than ALDVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALDVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGMCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALDVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HGMCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the short-term than ALDVF.

Price Growth

ALDVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -20.70% price change this week, while HGMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1733.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.70% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGMCF($12.2B) has a higher market cap than ALDVF($3.31M). HGMCF YTD gains are higher at: 134.825 vs. ALDVF (42.671). HGMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20B vs. ALDVF (-228.1K). HGMCF has more cash in the bank: 9.4B vs. ALDVF (779K). HGMCF has higher revenues than ALDVF: HGMCF (67.1B) vs ALDVF (0).
ALDVFHGMCFALDVF / HGMCF
Capitalization3.31M12.2B0%
EBITDA-228.1K20B-0%
Gain YTD42.671134.82532%
P/E RatioN/A14.79-
Revenue067.1B-
Total Cash779K9.4B0%
Total DebtN/A2.11B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALDVF vs HGMCF: Fundamental Ratings
ALDVF
HGMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8595
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9115
SMR RATING
1..100
9537
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10065
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGMCF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as ALDVF (45). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew similarly to ALDVF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALDVF (91). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ALDVF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALDVF (95). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALDVF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ALDVF (41). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew similarly to ALDVF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALDVF (100). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALDVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALDVFHGMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALDVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FELE93.911.07
+1.15%
Franklin Electric Co
UTSI2.370.01
+0.42%
UTStarcom Holdings Corp
IMO87.81-0.44
-0.50%
Imperial Oil Limited
EVC2.10-0.02
-0.94%
Entravision Communication
FTRE9.55-0.27
-2.75%
Fortrea Holdings

ALDVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALDVF and THXPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALDVF and THXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALDVF
1D Price
Change %
ALDVF100%
N/A
THXPF - ALDVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.80%
HGMCF - ALDVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
GPTRF - ALDVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
EQX - ALDVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
GAU - ALDVF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More

HGMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGMCF and ALDVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGMCF and ALDVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGMCF
1D Price
Change %
HGMCF100%
-0.41%
ALDVF - HGMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEGCF - HGMCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-7.65%
HVGDF - HGMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+17.35%