ALDFU
Price
$10.65
Change
+$0.10 (+0.95%)
Updated
Nov 7, 11:23 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBXD
Price
$10.55
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
268.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALDFU vs SBXD

Header iconALDFU vs SBXD Comparison
Open Charts ALDFU vs SBXDBanner chart's image
Aldel Financial II
Price$10.65
Change+$0.10 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
SilverBox Corp IV
Price$10.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$29.01K
Capitalization268.55M
ALDFU vs SBXD Comparison Chart in %
ALDFU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBXD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALDFU vs. SBXD commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALDFU is a Hold and SBXD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ALDFU: $10.55 vs. SBXD: $10.55)
Brand notoriety: ALDFU and SBXD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALDFU: 0% vs. SBXD: 53%
Market capitalization -- ALDFU: $0 vs. SBXD: $268.55M
ALDFU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. SBXD’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $268.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $174.77M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALDFU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBXD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALDFU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBXD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ALDFU and SBXD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALDFU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBXD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALDFU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBXD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALDFU is a better buy in the short-term than SBXD.

Price Growth

ALDFU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBXD (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.27% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALDFU YTD gains are higher at: 4.871 vs. SBXD (4.554). ALDFU has more cash in the bank: 809K vs. SBXD (279K).
ALDFUSBXDALDFU / SBXD
CapitalizationN/A269M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.8714.554107%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash809K279K290%
Total Debt178KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALDFUSBXD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
31%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALDFU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBXD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIFZF20.750.13
+0.62%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
ASXSF0.37N/A
N/A
Elysee Development Corp.
BNKHF4.60N/A
N/A
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
ZLDSF31.01N/A
N/A
ZALANDO SE
NORSF0.10N/A
N/A
NORSK TITANIUM AS

ALDFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALDFU and POLEU have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALDFU and POLEU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALDFU
1D Price
Change %
ALDFU100%
N/A
POLEU - ALDFU
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBXD - ALDFU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OACCU - ALDFU
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVN - ALDFU
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONDU - ALDFU
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBXD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBXD has been loosely correlated with MBAV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBXD jumps, then MBAV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBXD
1D Price
Change %
SBXD100%
N/A
MBAV - SBXD
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
BAYA - SBXD
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IROHU - SBXD
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLUW - SBXD
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBAVU - SBXD
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More