ALBKY
Price
$0.96
Change
+$0.04 (+4.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
25 days until earnings call
CZWI
Price
$14.73
Change
+$0.28 (+1.94%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
127.47M
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALBKY vs CZWI

Header iconALBKY vs CZWI Comparison
Open Charts ALBKY vs CZWIBanner chart's image
Alpha Services and Holdings SA
Price$0.96
Change+$0.04 (+4.35%)
Volume$126.02K
Capitalization4.23B
Citizens Community Ban
Price$14.73
Change+$0.28 (+1.94%)
Volume$41.41K
Capitalization127.47M
ALBKY vs CZWI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALBKY vs. CZWI commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBKY is a Buy and CZWI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ALBKY: $0.96 vs. CZWI: $14.73)
Brand notoriety: ALBKY and CZWI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALBKY: 106% vs. CZWI: 71%
Market capitalization -- ALBKY: $4.23B vs. CZWI: $127.47M
ALBKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.23B. CZWI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $127.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALBKY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCZWI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALBKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CZWI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALBKY is a better buy in the long-term than CZWI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALBKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZWI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALBKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CZWI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the short-term than ALBKY.

Price Growth

ALBKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.67% price change this week, while CZWI (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALBKY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALBKY($4.24B) has a higher market cap than CZWI($127M). CZWI has higher P/E ratio than ALBKY: CZWI (9.75) vs ALBKY (9.17). ALBKY YTD gains are higher at: 153.793 vs. CZWI (-7.482). CZWI has less debt than ALBKY: CZWI (147M) vs ALBKY (2.91B). ALBKY has higher revenues than CZWI: ALBKY (2.29B) vs CZWI (58.5M).
ALBKYCZWIALBKY / CZWI
Capitalization4.24B127M3,335%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD153.793-7.482-2,056%
P/E Ratio9.179.7594%
Revenue2.29B58.5M3,921%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.91B147M1,982%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALBKY vs CZWI: Fundamental Ratings
ALBKY
CZWI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
641
SMR RATING
1..100
1052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
823
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZWI's Valuation (29) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ALBKY (46) in the null industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to ALBKY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZWI (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALBKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZWI (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALBKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CZWI (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALBKY’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CZWI (23) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALBKY’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBKYCZWI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPCX25.350.26
+1.04%
SPAC and New Issue ETF
IDU104.710.87
+0.84%
iShares US Utilities ETF
JULT42.000.17
+0.41%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
TPHD38.610.11
+0.29%
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF
MFSM24.40-0.01
-0.06%
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF

ALBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALBKY and WTBFA have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALBKY and WTBFA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALBKY
1D Price
Change %
ALBKY100%
+4.33%
WTBFA - ALBKY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBGIF - ALBKY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
HARL - ALBKY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
CZWI - ALBKY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FSBH - ALBKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CZWI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZWI
1D Price
Change %
CZWI100%
+1.94%
SHBI - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
UCB - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
FITB - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBNC - CZWI
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
UBFO - CZWI
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More