Advertisement
ALBHF vs PETS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBHF is a Hold and PETS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALBHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePETS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ALBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PETS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALBHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PETS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALBHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PETS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
ALBHF (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а -3.65% price change this week, while PETS (@Drugstore Chains) price change was -20.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was +4.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
PETS is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Drugstore Chains (+4.60% weekly)The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.
| ALBHF | PETS | ALBHF / PETS | |
| Capitalization | 12.2B | 41M | 29,756% |
| EBITDA | 1.34B | 7.52M | 17,818% |
| Gain YTD | 88.017 | -39.834 | -221% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.08 | 256.00 | 23% |
| Revenue | 28.3B | 247M | 11,457% |
| Total Cash | 7.73B | 50.1M | 15,437% |
| Total Debt | 68M | 1.11M | 6,154% |
ALBHF | PETS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PETS's Valuation (7) in the Drugstore Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALBHF (80) in the null industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew significantly faster than ALBHF’s over the last 12 months.
PETS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as ALBHF (100) in the null industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to ALBHF’s over the last 12 months.
ALBHF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PETS (90) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that ALBHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PETS’s over the last 12 months.
ALBHF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PETS (64) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to PETS’s over the last 12 months.
ALBHF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PETS (90) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that ALBHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PETS’s over the last 12 months.
| ALBHF | PETS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
ALBHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ALBHF and ALBBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALBHF and ALBBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALBHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALBHF | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| ALBBY - ALBHF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDGT - ALBHF | 19% Poorly correlated | +6.28% | ||
| CLCGY - ALBHF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HEWA - ALBHF | 4% Poorly correlated | -18.93% | ||
| PETS - ALBHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -32.59% | ||
More | ||||
PETS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PETS and LFMD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PETS and LFMD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PETS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETS | 100% | +7.81% | ||
| LFMD - PETS | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| YI - PETS | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| HITI - PETS | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
| HEWA - PETS | 7% Poorly correlated | -17.55% | ||
| SCNX - PETS | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.98% | ||
More | ||||