ALBHF
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.03 (-3.61%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
12.84B
CLCGY
Price
$41.03
Change
+$0.44 (+1.08%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALBHF vs CLCGY

Header iconALBHF vs CLCGY Comparison
Open Charts ALBHF vs CLCGYBanner chart's image
Alibaba Health Information Technology
Price$0.80
Change-$0.03 (-3.61%)
Volume$107
Capitalization12.84B
Clicks Group
Price$41.03
Change+$0.44 (+1.08%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization4.78B
ALBHF vs CLCGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLCGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALBHF vs. CLCGY commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBHF is a Hold and CLCGY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ALBHF: $0.80 vs. CLCGY: $41.03)
Brand notoriety: ALBHF and CLCGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Drugstore Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALBHF: 4% vs. CLCGY: 59%
Market capitalization -- ALBHF: $12.84B vs. CLCGY: $4.78B
ALBHF [@Drugstore Chains] is valued at $12.84B. CLCGY’s [@Drugstore Chains] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $26.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $3.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALBHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLCGY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLCGY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALBHF is a better buy in the long-term than CLCGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALBHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLCGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALBHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLCGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLCGY is a better buy in the short-term than ALBHF.

Price Growth

ALBHF (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а -11.61% price change this week, while CLCGY (@Drugstore Chains) price change was -2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Drugstore Chains (-3.13% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALBHF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than CLCGY($4.78B). ALBHF has higher P/E ratio than CLCGY: ALBHF (63.90) vs CLCGY (28.24). ALBHF YTD gains are higher at: 99.435 vs. CLCGY (6.815).
ALBHFCLCGYALBHF / CLCGY
Capitalization12.8B4.78B268%
EBITDA1.34BN/A-
Gain YTD99.4356.8151,459%
P/E Ratio63.9028.24226%
Revenue28.3BN/A-
Total Cash7.73BN/A-
Total Debt68MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALBHF vs CLCGY: Fundamental Ratings
ALBHF
CLCGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
1743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALBHF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (97). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

CLCGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALBHF (100). This means that CLCGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (43). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (58). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCGY (77). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBHFCLCGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLCGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVNM69.920.28
+0.40%
Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF
AGZD22.450.04
+0.20%
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF
SIXZ29.180.05
+0.16%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 May/Nov ETF
HTRB34.33-0.02
-0.07%
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
GMUN50.31-0.09
-0.18%
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF

ALBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALBHF and ALBBY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALBHF and ALBBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALBHF
1D Price
Change %
ALBHF100%
-4.22%
ALBBY - ALBHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGT - ALBHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
HEWA - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCGY - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
PETS - ALBHF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLCGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCGY and RDGT have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCGY and RDGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCGY
1D Price
Change %
CLCGY100%
+1.08%
RDGT - CLCGY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
ALBHF - CLCGY
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
MSMKF - CLCGY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEWA - CLCGY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALBBY - CLCGY
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More