ALBHF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.58B
CLCGY
Price
$41.36
Change
-$0.30 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALBHF vs CLCGY

Header iconALBHF vs CLCGY Comparison
Open Charts ALBHF vs CLCGYBanner chart's image
Alibaba Health Information Technology
Price$0.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.93K
Capitalization9.58B
Clicks Group
Price$41.36
Change-$0.30 (-0.72%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization3.84B
ALBHF vs CLCGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLCGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALBHF vs. CLCGY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBHF is a Hold and CLCGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ALBHF: $0.61 vs. CLCGY: $41.36)
Brand notoriety: ALBHF and CLCGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Drugstore Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALBHF: 58% vs. CLCGY: 75%
Market capitalization -- ALBHF: $9.58B vs. CLCGY: $3.84B
ALBHF [@Drugstore Chains] is valued at $9.58B. CLCGY’s [@Drugstore Chains] market capitalization is $3.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $18.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALBHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLCGY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLCGY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALBHF is a better buy in the long-term than CLCGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALBHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLCGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALBHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLCGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALBHF is a better buy in the short-term than CLCGY.

Price Growth

ALBHF (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а +4.74% price change this week, while CLCGY (@Drugstore Chains) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Drugstore Chains (+0.51% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALBHF($9.58B) has a higher market cap than CLCGY($3.84B). ALBHF has higher P/E ratio than CLCGY: ALBHF (129.87) vs CLCGY (25.84). ALBHF YTD gains are higher at: 53.873 vs. CLCGY (7.668). CLCGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.21B vs. ALBHF (557M). CLCGY has higher revenues than ALBHF: CLCGY (40B) vs ALBHF (26.8B).
ALBHFCLCGYALBHF / CLCGY
Capitalization9.58B3.84B249%
EBITDA557M5.21B11%
Gain YTD53.8737.668703%
P/E Ratio129.8725.84503%
Revenue26.8B40B67%
Total Cash10.9BN/A-
Total Debt77.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALBHF vs CLCGY: Fundamental Ratings
ALBHF
CLCGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
1390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALBHF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (97). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

CLCGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALBHF (100). This means that CLCGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCGY (90). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (53). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (62). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBHFCLCGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLCGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDOW39.110.16
+0.42%
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
XLK262.050.66
+0.25%
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
BLCV35.440.03
+0.10%
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
RNEW25.06N/A
N/A
VanEck ETF Trust VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF
PID21.05-0.06
-0.27%
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF

ALBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALBHF and ALBBY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALBHF and ALBBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALBHF
1D Price
Change %
ALBHF100%
+0.62%
ALBBY - ALBHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGT - ALBHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
HEWA - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCGY - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
PETS - ALBHF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
More

CLCGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCGY and WBA have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCGY and WBA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCGY
1D Price
Change %
CLCGY100%
-0.72%
WBA - CLCGY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGT - CLCGY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
ALBHF - CLCGY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
MSMKF - CLCGY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEWA - CLCGY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More