ALB
Price
$72.58
Change
-$9.43 (-11.50%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.65B
50 days until earnings call
LITP
Price
$7.82
Change
-$0.51 (-6.12%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALB vs LITP

Header iconALB vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs LITPBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$72.58
Change-$9.43 (-11.50%)
Volume$50.41K
Capitalization9.65B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.82
Change-$0.51 (-6.12%)
Volume$2.8K
Net Assets21.16M
ALB vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. LITP commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ALB: $82.00)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • ALB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.44% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.07% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBLITP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXA65.250.42
+0.65%
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust
KJAN39.830.01
+0.03%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
NEWZ28.660.01
+0.02%
EA Series Trust StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF
IYK69.54-0.52
-0.74%
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF
AAPY23.77-0.20
-0.85%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Apple ETF

ALB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALB has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALB jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALB
1D Price
Change %
ALB100%
+0.56%
SQM - ALB
79%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
OLN - ALB
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
DD - ALB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CC - ALB
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
HUN - ALB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More

LITP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITP
1D Price
Change %
LITP100%
+1.22%
SQM - LITP
76%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
ALB - LITP
76%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
SGML - LITP
67%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
LAC - LITP
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
LAR - LITP
49%
Loosely correlated
-6.52%
More