ALB
Price
$83.74
Change
-$0.44 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.48B
3 days until earnings call
CC
Price
$14.17
Change
+$0.17 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.91B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALB vs CC

Header iconALB vs CC Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs CCBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$83.74
Change-$0.44 (-0.52%)
Volume$5.38M
Capitalization15.48B
Chemours Company (The)
Price$14.17
Change+$0.17 (+1.21%)
Volume$2.8M
Capitalization3.91B
ALB vs CC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. CC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Buy and CC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ALB: $83.74 vs. CC: $14.17)
Brand notoriety: ALB: Not notable vs. CC: Notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 136% vs. CC: 67%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $15.48B vs. CC: $3.91B
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $15.48B. CC’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CC is a better buy in the long-term than ALB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ALB and CC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +8.65% price change this week, while CC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

CC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($15.5B) has a higher market cap than CC($3.91B). CC has higher P/E ratio than ALB: CC (11.93) vs ALB (9.67). ALB YTD gains are higher at: -1.533 vs. CC (-14.071). ALB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793M vs. CC (197M). CC has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. ALB (890M). ALB (4.28B) and CC (4.3B) have identical debt. ALB has higher revenues than CC: ALB (9.62B) vs CC (6.03B).
ALBCCALB / CC
Capitalization15.5B3.91B397%
EBITDA793M197M403%
Gain YTD-1.533-14.07111%
P/E Ratio9.6711.9381%
Revenue9.62B6.03B160%
Total Cash890M1.2B74%
Total Debt4.28B4.3B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB vs CC: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
CC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9493
SMR RATING
1..100
9384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CC's Valuation (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALB (94) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CC’s stock grew significantly faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

CC's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (94) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CC’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

CC's SMR Rating (84) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (93) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CC’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as CC (53) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as CC (5) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAYZ32.270.61
+1.94%
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF
NZF11.630.04
+0.35%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
EVF5.620.01
+0.18%
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust
HTAB18.470.01
+0.05%
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
SIXG54.22-0.06
-0.10%
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF

ALB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALB has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALB jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALB
1D Price
Change %
ALB100%
-0.52%
SQM - ALB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
DD - ALB
66%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
DOW - ALB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
OLN - ALB
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
CC - ALB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

CC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CC has been closely correlated with TROX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CC jumps, then TROX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CC
1D Price
Change %
CC100%
+1.21%
TROX - CC
74%
Closely correlated
+3.56%
OLN - CC
71%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
KRO - CC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
PPG - CC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
AVNT - CC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
More