It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALAR (@Packaged Software) experienced а +22.81% price change this week, while SAP (@Packaged Software) price change was +10.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.43%.
ALAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2024.
SAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ALAR | SAP | ALAR / SAP | |
Capitalization | 129M | 227B | 0% |
EBITDA | -2.9M | 7.5B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -34.025 | 6.397 | -532% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 58.94 | - |
Revenue | 26.5M | 31.2B | 0% |
Total Cash | 10.9M | 11.5B | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.99M | 8.79B | 0% |
ALAR | SAP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAP's Valuation (19) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ALAR (44) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAP’s stock grew similarly to ALAR’s over the last 12 months.
SAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALAR (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAP’s stock grew significantly faster than ALAR’s over the last 12 months.
ALAR's SMR Rating (33) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAP (79) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ALAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAP’s over the last 12 months.
SAP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALAR (88) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALAR’s over the last 12 months.
SAP's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALAR (68) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALAR’s over the last 12 months.
ALAR | SAP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago43% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago47% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago85% | 9 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAR has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAR jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ALAR | 100% | +1.60% | ||
HUBS - ALAR | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.72% | ||
S - ALAR | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
DDOG - ALAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
SAP - ALAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
CRWD - ALAR | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.73% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAP has been loosely correlated with ANSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAP jumps, then ANSS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAP | 100% | +0.94% | ||
ANSS - SAP | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
DSGX - SAP | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
ADSK - SAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
SNPS - SAP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
CYBR - SAP | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
More |