Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALAFX vs CGFAX
ALAFX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts ALAFX vs CGFAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
ALAFX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALAFX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAFX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ALAFX (3.49B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ALAFX: CGFAX (0.32) vs ALAFX (0.00). ALAFX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: ALAFX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). ALAFX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). ALAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.43 vs. CGFAX (25.00). ALAFX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALAFX: CGFAX (250) vs ALAFX (1000). ALAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.09 vs. CGFAX (14.57). ALAFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.25 vs. CGFAX (44.65).
| ALAFX | CGFAX | ALAFX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.65 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.65 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.597 | 14.270 | 193% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.09 | 14.57 | 351% |
| Returns for 3 years | 126.56 | 42.81 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.25 | 44.65 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 312.64 | 92.49 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement