ALAB
Price
$91.02
Change
-$6.94 (-7.08%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.01B
44 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$64.00
Change
+$1.48 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.87B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB vs RMBS

Header iconALAB vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs RMBSBanner chart's image
Astera Labs
Price$91.02
Change-$6.94 (-7.08%)
Volume$10.06M
Capitalization15.01B
Rambus
Price$64.00
Change+$1.48 (+2.37%)
Volume$1.94M
Capitalization6.87B
ALAB vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALAB vs. RMBS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAB is a Hold and RMBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ALAB: $91.02 vs. RMBS: $64.00)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and RMBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 234% vs. RMBS: 198%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $15.01B vs. RMBS: $6.87B
ALAB [@Semiconductors] is valued at $15.01B. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $6.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.85T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $59.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than ALAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а -8.55% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +7.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.05% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALAB($15B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($6.87B). ALAB has higher P/E ratio than RMBS: ALAB (69.46) vs RMBS (33.51). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 21.075 vs. ALAB (-31.280). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 276M vs. ALAB (-18.15M). ALAB has more cash in the bank: 925M vs. RMBS (514M). ALAB has less debt than RMBS: ALAB (1.29M) vs RMBS (29.2M). RMBS has higher revenues than ALAB: RMBS (605M) vs ALAB (490M).
ALABRMBSALAB / RMBS
Capitalization15B6.87B218%
EBITDA-18.15M276M-7%
Gain YTD-31.28021.075-148%
P/E Ratio69.4633.51207%
Revenue490M605M81%
Total Cash925M514M180%
Total Debt1.29M29.2M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAGX42.770.83
+1.98%
Roundhill Daily 2X Lon Mag Sev ETF
OCTW36.990.16
+0.42%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Oct ETF
FNCL73.360.24
+0.33%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
RNEM55.19N/A
N/A
First Trust Emerging Markets Eq Sel ETF
LIAT224.64N/A
N/A
LifeX 2059 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been closely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
-7.08%
CRDO - ALAB
69%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
AVGO - ALAB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
MTSI - ALAB
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
RMBS - ALAB
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
NVDA - ALAB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+2.37%
LRCX - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
KLIC - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
AMKR - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
KLAC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
AMAT - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More