AL
Price
$63.59
Change
+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Updated
Sep 25, 03:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.1B
35 days until earnings call
PYPL
Price
$66.77
Change
-$1.09 (-1.61%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
64.83B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AL vs PYPL

Header iconAL vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts AL vs PYPLBanner chart's image
Air Lease
Price$63.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Volume$6.85K
Capitalization7.1B
PayPal Holdings
Price$66.77
Change-$1.09 (-1.61%)
Volume$4.63K
Capitalization64.83B
AL vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AL vs. PYPL commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AL is a StrongBuy and PYPL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (AL: $63.54 vs. PYPL: $67.86)
Brand notoriety: AL: Not notable vs. PYPL: Notable
AL represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while PYPL is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AL: 82% vs. PYPL: 80%
Market capitalization -- AL: $7.1B vs. PYPL: $64.83B
AL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $7.1B. PYPL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $64.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $60.21B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $657.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.7B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AL is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYPL is a better buy in the short-term than AL.

Price Growth

AL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while PYPL (@Savings Banks) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

AL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.03% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Savings Banks (-1.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYPL($64.8B) has a higher market cap than AL($7.1B). PYPL has higher P/E ratio than AL: PYPL (14.53) vs AL (7.71). AL YTD gains are higher at: 33.387 vs. PYPL (-20.492). PYPL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.26B vs. AL (2.47B). PYPL has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. AL (455M). PYPL has less debt than AL: PYPL (11.3B) vs AL (20.3B). PYPL has higher revenues than AL: PYPL (32.3B) vs AL (2.87B).
ALPYPLAL / PYPL
Capitalization7.1B64.8B11%
EBITDA2.47B7.26B34%
Gain YTD33.387-20.492-163%
P/E Ratio7.7114.5353%
Revenue2.87B32.3B9%
Total Cash455M10B5%
Total Debt20.3B11.3B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AL vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
AL
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
6341
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYPL's Valuation (83) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as AL (86) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

AL's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AL’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

PYPL's SMR Rating (41) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as AL (63) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

AL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (62) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AL’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

AL's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (78) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AL’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPI41.020.64
+1.57%
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
XRMI17.62N/A
-0.03%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
MFSB25.31-0.03
-0.12%
MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF
QEFA87.15-0.45
-0.51%
SPDR® MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
FXZ61.27-0.41
-0.66%
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF

AL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AL has been closely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AL jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AL
1D Price
Change %
AL100%
+0.05%
OMF - AL
75%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
AER - AL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
SYF - AL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
ENVA - AL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
SLM - AL
68%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
More

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
+0.82%
SYF - PYPL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
OMF - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
COF - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
BFH - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
AL - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More