AKBLF
Price
$22.35
Change
+$0.30 (+1.36%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
OCEA
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.05 (-7.81%)
Updated
Dec 24, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

AKBLF vs OCEA

Header iconAKBLF vs OCEA Comparison
Open Charts AKBLF vs OCEABanner chart's image
Alk Abello AS
Price$22.35
Change+$0.30 (+1.36%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Ocean Biomedical
Price$0.59
Change-$0.05 (-7.81%)
Volume$1.75K
CapitalizationN/A
AKBLF vs OCEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
OCEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKBLF vs. OCEA commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKBLF is a Hold and OCEA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (AKBLF: $22.35 vs. OCEA: $0.64)
Brand notoriety: AKBLF and OCEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKBLF: 98% vs. OCEA: 152%
Market capitalization -- AKBLF: $4.85B vs. OCEA: $20.57M
AKBLF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $4.85B. OCEA’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $20.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $385.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCEA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AKBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCEA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AKBLF is a better buy in the long-term than OCEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCEA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OCEA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AKBLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а +1.36% price change this week, while OCEA (@Biotechnology) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCEA is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-1.01% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AKBLF($4.85B) has a higher market cap than OCEA($22.3M). AKBLF YTD gains are higher at: 68.679 vs. OCEA (-3.015).
AKBLFOCEAAKBLF / OCEA
Capitalization4.85B22.3M21,749%
EBITDA1.34BN/A-
Gain YTD68.679-3.015-2,278%
P/E Ratio45.79N/A-
Revenue5.38BN/A-
Total Cash556MN/A-
Total Debt510MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AKBLF: Fundamental Ratings
AKBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OCEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME30.901.08
+3.62%
GameStop Corp
TSLA430.609.54
+2.27%
Tesla
SPY594.693.54
+0.60%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL255.270.78
+0.31%
Apple
BTC.X94686.240000-418.695300
-0.44%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

AKBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AKBLF has been loosely correlated with CRDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AKBLF jumps, then CRDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKBLF
1D Price
Change %
AKBLF100%
N/A
CRDF - AKBLF
37%
Loosely correlated
-4.46%
MSCLF - AKBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
OCEA - AKBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
NGNE - AKBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
ADIL - AKBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
More

OCEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCEA has been loosely correlated with ONWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCEA jumps, then ONWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCEA
1D Price
Change %
OCEA100%
-3.61%
ONWRF - OCEA
42%
Loosely correlated
+15.53%
MRVI - OCEA
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.47%
ABVX - OCEA
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.92%
AKBLF - OCEA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOSEF - OCEA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More