AKA
Price
$10.73
Change
-$0.14 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
116.35M
ALEGF
Price
$7.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 20 closing price
Capitalization
10.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AKA vs ALEGF

Header iconAKA vs ALEGF Comparison
Open Charts AKA vs ALEGFBanner chart's image
aka Brands Holding
Price$10.73
Change-$0.14 (-1.29%)
Volume$2.73K
Capitalization116.35M
ALLEGRO EU SA
Price$7.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.14K
Capitalization10.07B
AKA vs ALEGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKA vs. ALEGF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKA is a Hold and ALEGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AKA: $10.73 vs. ALEGF: $7.65)
Brand notoriety: AKA and ALEGF are both not notable
AKA represents the Apparel/Footwear Retail, while ALEGF is part of the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKA: 75% vs. ALEGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AKA: $116.35M vs. ALEGF: $10.07B
AKA [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $116.35M. ALEGF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $10.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $154.99B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.48T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $14.54B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $50.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileALEGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AKA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ALEGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AKA is a better buy in the long-term than ALEGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AKA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

AKA (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -5.05% price change this week, while ALEGF (@Internet Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +123.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+1.63% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

@Internet Retail (+2.24% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALEGF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than AKA($116M). ALEGF YTD gains are higher at: 14.009 vs. AKA (-42.685). ALEGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.09B vs. AKA (5.33M). ALEGF has more cash in the bank: 4.09B vs. AKA (23.1M). AKA has less debt than ALEGF: AKA (195M) vs ALEGF (6.36B). ALEGF has higher revenues than AKA: ALEGF (11B) vs AKA (598M).
AKAALEGFAKA / ALEGF
Capitalization116M10.1B1%
EBITDA5.33M3.09B0%
Gain YTD-42.68514.009-305%
P/E RatioN/A27.71-
Revenue598M11B5%
Total Cash23.1M4.09B1%
Total Debt195M6.36B3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKAALEGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVD11.040.57
+5.44%
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
RETL10.590.13
+1.24%
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X ETF
ROM80.820.20
+0.25%
ProShares Ultra Technology
PBJN29.110.07
+0.22%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jun
IUSV98.55-0.42
-0.42%
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF

AKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AKA has been loosely correlated with FL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AKA jumps, then FL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKA
1D Price
Change %
AKA100%
-1.29%
FL - AKA
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CTRN - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
IPW - AKA
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
W - AKA
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.22%
NEGG - AKA
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.61%
More

ALEGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALEGF and AKA have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALEGF and AKA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALEGF
1D Price
Change %
ALEGF100%
N/A
AKA - ALEGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
DIBS - ALEGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
RERE - ALEGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
DELHY - ALEGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
OISXF - ALEGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More