AJMPF
Price
$2.42
Change
+$0.11 (+4.78%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.43B
SEIC
Price
$87.42
Change
+$0.25 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.81B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AJMPF vs SEIC

Header iconAJMPF vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts AJMPF vs SEICBanner chart's image
Ashmore Group
Price$2.42
Change+$0.11 (+4.78%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.43B
SEI Investments
Price$87.42
Change+$0.25 (+0.29%)
Volume$35.76K
Capitalization10.81B
AJMPF vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AJMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AJMPF vs. SEIC commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AJMPF is a Hold and SEIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AJMPF: $2.41 vs. SEIC: $87.17)
Brand notoriety: AJMPF and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AJMPF: 32% vs. SEIC: 101%
Market capitalization -- AJMPF: $1.44B vs. SEIC: $10.81B
AJMPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.44B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $171.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AJMPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AJMPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AJMPF is a better buy in the long-term than SEIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AJMPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AJMPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AJMPF is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

AJMPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC($10.8B) has a higher market cap than AJMPF($1.43B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than AJMPF: SEIC (16.43) vs AJMPF (15.27). AJMPF YTD gains are higher at: 21.393 vs. SEIC (6.294). SEIC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 957M vs. AJMPF (107M). SEIC has more cash in the bank: 778M vs. AJMPF (696M). AJMPF has less debt than SEIC: AJMPF (6M) vs SEIC (29M). SEIC has higher revenues than AJMPF: SEIC (2.21B) vs AJMPF (174M).
AJMPFSEICAJMPF / SEIC
Capitalization1.43B10.8B13%
EBITDA107M957M11%
Gain YTD21.3936.294340%
P/E Ratio15.2716.4393%
Revenue174M2.21B8%
Total Cash696M778M89%
Total Debt6M29M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AJMPF vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
AJMPF
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10024
SMR RATING
1..100
6132
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2659
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AJMPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AJMPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AJMPF (100) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AJMPF (61) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SEIC (51) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (59) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AJMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AJMPFSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AJMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ULE13.160.15
+1.18%
ProShares Ultra Euro
AGGH20.920.11
+0.53%
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
SMAX26.57-0.02
-0.09%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
QUS167.45-0.54
-0.32%
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
MVFD27.45-0.20
-0.71%
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF

AJMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AJMPF and RHCO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AJMPF and RHCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AJMPF
1D Price
Change %
AJMPF100%
N/A
RHCO - AJMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.42%
SEIC - AJMPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
AZIHF - AJMPF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWKH - AJMPF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
BRSGF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-2.30%
TROW - SEIC
78%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
JHG - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
BN - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
KKR - SEIC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
AMG - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
More