AJMPF
Price
$2.33
Change
-$0.06 (-2.51%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AZIHF
Price
$43.71
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AJMPF vs AZIHF

Header iconAJMPF vs AZIHF Comparison
Open Charts AJMPF vs AZIHFBanner chart's image
Ashmore Group
Price$2.33
Change-$0.06 (-2.51%)
Volume$531
Capitalization1.43B
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$43.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$313
Capitalization5.92B
AJMPF vs AZIHF Comparison Chart in %
AJMPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AZIHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AJMPF vs. AZIHF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AJMPF is a Hold and AZIHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AJMPF: $2.33 vs. AZIHF: $43.71)
Brand notoriety: AJMPF and AZIHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AJMPF: 42% vs. AZIHF: 16%
Market capitalization -- AJMPF: $1.43B vs. AZIHF: $5.92B
AJMPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.43B. AZIHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AJMPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAZIHF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AJMPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the long-term than AJMPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AJMPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AZIHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AJMPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the short-term than AJMPF.

Price Growth

AJMPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -9.79% price change this week, while AZIHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($5.92B) has a higher market cap than AJMPF($1.43B). AJMPF has higher P/E ratio than AZIHF: AJMPF (15.01) vs AZIHF (10.40). AZIHF YTD gains are higher at: 85.212 vs. AJMPF (16.995). AZIHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 723M vs. AJMPF (107M). AJMPF has more cash in the bank: 696M vs. AZIHF (426M). AJMPF has less debt than AZIHF: AJMPF (6M) vs AZIHF (23.3M). AZIHF has higher revenues than AJMPF: AZIHF (1.35B) vs AJMPF (174M).
AJMPFAZIHFAJMPF / AZIHF
Capitalization1.43B5.92B24%
EBITDA107M723M15%
Gain YTD16.99585.21220%
P/E Ratio15.0110.40144%
Revenue174M1.35B13%
Total Cash696M426M163%
Total Debt6M23.3M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AJMPF vs AZIHF: Fundamental Ratings
AJMPF
AZIHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9738
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
6033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4510
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AJMPF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (15). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AJMPF (100). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as AJMPF (60). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as AJMPF (58). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AJMPF (45). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AJMPFAZIHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AJMPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AZIHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRAX36.090.27
+0.75%
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq R6
HBLVX15.390.03
+0.20%
Hartford Balanced Income R6
MIEFX16.910.02
+0.12%
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Ins
DHLSX31.240.02
+0.06%
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
ARYTX13.66-0.09
-0.65%
American Century Global Real Estate C

AJMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AJMPF and AZIHF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AJMPF and AZIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AJMPF
1D Price
Change %
AJMPF100%
N/A
AZIHF - AJMPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
AGFMF - AJMPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
AABVF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSGF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - AJMPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and AJMPF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and AJMPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
+0.02%
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AZIHF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
AGFMF - AZIHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
BRSGF - AZIHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More