AJMPF
Price
$2.18
Change
+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
AZIHF
Price
$36.00
Change
+$4.80 (+15.38%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AJMPF vs AZIHF

Header iconAJMPF vs AZIHF Comparison
Open Charts AJMPF vs AZIHFBanner chart's image
Ashmore Group
Price$2.18
Change+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Volume$277
Capitalization1.89B
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$36.00
Change+$4.80 (+15.38%)
Volume$2.43K
Capitalization3.28B
AJMPF vs AZIHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AJMPF vs. AZIHF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AJMPF is a Hold and AZIHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AJMPF: $2.18 vs. AZIHF: $36.00)
Brand notoriety: AJMPF and AZIHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AJMPF: 100% vs. AZIHF: 753%
Market capitalization -- AJMPF: $1.89B vs. AZIHF: $3.28B
AJMPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.89B. AZIHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AJMPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAZIHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AJMPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the long-term than AJMPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZIHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AJMPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AZIHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +15.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($3.28B) has a higher market cap than AJMPF($1.89B). AJMPF has higher P/E ratio than AZIHF: AJMPF (40.16) vs AZIHF (7.62). AZIHF YTD gains are higher at: 52.542 vs. AJMPF (9.581). AZIHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 605M vs. AJMPF (59.8M). AJMPF has more cash in the bank: 760M vs. AZIHF (346M). AJMPF has less debt than AZIHF: AJMPF (6.8M) vs AZIHF (586M). AZIHF has higher revenues than AJMPF: AZIHF (1.16B) vs AJMPF (221M).
AJMPFAZIHFAJMPF / AZIHF
Capitalization1.89B3.28B58%
EBITDA59.8M605M10%
Gain YTD9.58152.54218%
P/E Ratio40.167.62527%
Revenue221M1.16B19%
Total Cash760M346M220%
Total Debt6.8M586M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AJMPF vs AZIHF: Fundamental Ratings
AJMPF
AZIHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
5331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AJMPF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (16). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AJMPF (100). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as AJMPF (53). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as AJMPF (50). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (39). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AJMPFAZIHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSHLX52.450.48
+0.92%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth L
CMJIX44.270.31
+0.71%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
KLCSX20.860.13
+0.63%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
HNDDX75.400.26
+0.35%
Horizon Equity Premium Income Investor
RLEFX37.170.07
+0.19%
American Funds American Balanced R5E

AJMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AJMPF and RHCO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AJMPF and RHCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AJMPF
1D Price
Change %
AJMPF100%
N/A
RHCO - AJMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.11%
SEIC - AJMPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
AZIHF - AJMPF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWKH - AJMPF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
BRSGF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and OXSQ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and OXSQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
N/A
OXSQ - AZIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
GMHLF - AZIHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AZIHF
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AZIHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More