AIPUY
Price
$16.49
Change
+$2.14 (+14.91%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
24.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BJCHY
Price
$1.62
Change
-$0.13 (-7.43%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIPUY vs BJCHY

Header iconAIPUY vs BJCHY Comparison
Open Charts AIPUY vs BJCHYBanner chart's image
Airports of Thailand Public
Price$16.49
Change+$2.14 (+14.91%)
Volume$1.83K
Capitalization24.67B
Beijing Capital International Airport
Price$1.62
Change-$0.13 (-7.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.67B
AIPUY vs BJCHY Comparison Chart in %
AIPUY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BJCHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIPUY vs. BJCHY commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIPUY is a Buy and BJCHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AIPUY: $16.49 vs. BJCHY: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: AIPUY and BJCHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIPUY: 101% vs. BJCHY: 19%
Market capitalization -- AIPUY: $24.67B vs. BJCHY: $1.67B
AIPUY [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $24.67B. BJCHY’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $1.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $58.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $8.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIPUY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBJCHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIPUY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BJCHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIPUY and BJCHY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIPUY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BJCHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIPUY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BJCHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIPUY is a better buy in the short-term than BJCHY.

Price Growth

AIPUY (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +14.91% price change this week, while BJCHY (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

BJCHY is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+0.88% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIPUY($24.7B) has a higher market cap than BJCHY($1.67B). BJCHY YTD gains are higher at: 4.290 vs. AIPUY (-14.249). AIPUY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.9B vs. BJCHY (113M). AIPUY has higher revenues than BJCHY: AIPUY (66.7B) vs BJCHY (4.56B).
AIPUYBJCHYAIPUY / BJCHY
Capitalization24.7B1.67B1,477%
EBITDA37.9B113M33,540%
Gain YTD-14.2494.290-332%
P/E Ratio40.42N/A-
Revenue66.7B4.56B1,463%
Total Cash19.5BN/A-
Total Debt50.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIPUY vs BJCHY: Fundamental Ratings
AIPUY
BJCHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
682
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BJCHY's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as AIPUY (89). This means that BJCHY’s stock grew similarly to AIPUY’s over the last 12 months.

BJCHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AIPUY (100). This means that BJCHY’s stock grew similarly to AIPUY’s over the last 12 months.

AIPUY's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BJCHY (97). This means that AIPUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BJCHY’s over the last 12 months.

AIPUY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BJCHY (61). This means that AIPUY’s stock grew similarly to BJCHY’s over the last 12 months.

BJCHY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIPUY (68). This means that BJCHY’s stock grew significantly faster than AIPUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIPUYBJCHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIPUY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BJCHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIHY45.680.04
+0.09%
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
DBA25.660.01
+0.04%
Invesco DB Agriculture
MHLA12.93N/A
N/A
Maiden Holdings Ltd
UCIB28.04N/A
N/A
UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB
IWV391.82-0.25
-0.06%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF

AIPUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIPUY and SOAR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIPUY and SOAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIPUY
1D Price
Change %
AIPUY100%
N/A
SOAR - AIPUY
10%
Poorly correlated
-10.18%
OMAB - AIPUY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FLGZY - AIPUY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASR - AIPUY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
PAC - AIPUY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
More

BJCHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BJCHY and BJCHF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BJCHY and BJCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BJCHY
1D Price
Change %
BJCHY100%
N/A
BJCHF - BJCHY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLGZY - BJCHY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIPUY - BJCHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUKNY - BJCHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPRUF - BJCHY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More