Advertisement
AIPUF vs PAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIPUF is a Hold and PAC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AIPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AIPUF (@Other Transportation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAC (@Other Transportation) price change was -2.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (+1.23% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
| AIPUF | PAC | AIPUF / PAC | |
| Capitalization | 29.8B | 8.25B | 361% |
| EBITDA | 10.1B | 18.6B | 54% |
| Gain YTD | -34.392 | 30.401 | -113% |
| P/E Ratio | 46.30 | 14.01 | 331% |
| Revenue | 31B | 32.1B | 97% |
| Total Cash | 4.27B | 14.5B | 29% |
| Total Debt | 61B | N/A | - |
AIPUF | PAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAC's Valuation (69) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as AIPUF (82) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIPUF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's SMR Rating (25) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as AIPUF (52) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIPUF (83) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIPUF (90) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.
| AIPUF | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 4% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 4% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
AIPUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIPUF and BLDE have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIPUF and BLDE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIPUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIPUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLDE - AIPUF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| ASR - AIPUF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| PAC - AIPUF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| AEOXF - AIPUF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ACKDF - AIPUF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ASLE - PAC | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| BLDE - PAC | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||