AIPUF
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
PAC
Price
$181.17
Change
-$0.97 (-0.53%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:28 PM (EDT)
97 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIPUF vs PAC

Header iconAIPUF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts AIPUF vs PACBanner chart's image
Airports of Thailand Public
Price$2.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$173
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$181.17
Change-$0.97 (-0.53%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
AIPUF vs PAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIPUF vs. PAC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIPUF is a Hold and PAC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (AIPUF: $2.00 vs. PAC: $182.14)
Brand notoriety: AIPUF and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Transportation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIPUF: 6% vs. PAC: 112%
Market capitalization -- AIPUF: $29.81B vs. PAC: $8.24B
AIPUF [@Other Transportation] is valued at $29.81B. PAC’s [@Other Transportation] market capitalization is $8.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Transportation] industry ranges from $29.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Transportation] industry is $7.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AIPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than AIPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AIPUF (@Other Transportation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAC (@Other Transportation) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Transportation (-2.25% weekly)

Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIPUF($29.8B) has a higher market cap than PAC($8.25B). AIPUF has higher P/E ratio than PAC: AIPUF (46.30) vs PAC (14.01). AIPUF YTD gains are higher at: 21.951 vs. PAC (6.397). PAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.6B vs. AIPUF (10.1B). PAC has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. AIPUF (4.27B). PAC (32.1B) and AIPUF (31B) have equivalent revenues.
AIPUFPACAIPUF / PAC
Capitalization29.8B8.25B361%
EBITDA10.1B18.6B54%
Gain YTD21.9516.397343%
P/E Ratio46.3014.01331%
Revenue31B32.1B97%
Total Cash4.27B14.5B29%
Total Debt61BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIPUF vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
AIPUF
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9025
SMR RATING
1..100
8921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8121
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAC's Valuation (40) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIPUF (92) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIPUF (90) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (21) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIPUF (89) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

AIPUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PAC (49) in the Other Transportation industry. This means that AIPUF’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIPUF (81) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

AIPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIPUF and BLDE have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIPUF and BLDE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIPUF
1D Price
Change %
AIPUF100%
N/A
BLDE - AIPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.56%
ASR - AIPUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
PAC - AIPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
AEOXF - AIPUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACKDF - AIPUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
+3.14%
ASR - PAC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
OMAB - PAC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAAP - PAC
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
ASLE - PAC
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
JOBY - PAC
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More