AIPUF
Price
$1.31
Change
-$0.16 (-10.88%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
29.81B
PAC
Price
$230.21
Change
-$3.04 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.24B
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIPUF vs PAC

Header iconAIPUF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts AIPUF vs PACBanner chart's image
Airports of Thailand Public
Price$1.31
Change-$0.16 (-10.88%)
Volume$223
Capitalization29.81B
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$230.21
Change-$3.04 (-1.30%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization8.24B
AIPUF vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIPUF vs. PAC commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIPUF is a Hold and PAC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AIPUF: $1.31 vs. PAC: $233.25)
Brand notoriety: AIPUF and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Transportation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIPUF: 100% vs. PAC: 100%
Market capitalization -- AIPUF: $29.81B vs. PAC: $8.24B
AIPUF [@Other Transportation] is valued at $29.81B. PAC’s [@Other Transportation] market capitalization is $8.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Transportation] industry ranges from $29.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Transportation] industry is $7.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AIPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than AIPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIPUF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIPUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the short-term than AIPUF.

Price Growth

AIPUF (@Other Transportation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAC (@Other Transportation) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Transportation (+0.06% weekly)

Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIPUF($29.8B) has a higher market cap than PAC($8.25B). AIPUF has higher P/E ratio than PAC: AIPUF (46.30) vs PAC (14.01). PAC YTD gains are higher at: 35.829 vs. AIPUF (-34.392). PAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.6B vs. AIPUF (10.1B). PAC has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. AIPUF (4.27B). PAC (32.1B) and AIPUF (31B) have equivalent revenues.
AIPUFPACAIPUF / PAC
Capitalization29.8B8.25B361%
EBITDA10.1B18.6B54%
Gain YTD-34.39235.829-96%
P/E Ratio46.3014.01331%
Revenue31B32.1B97%
Total Cash4.27B14.5B29%
Total Debt61BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIPUF vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
AIPUF
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
5225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAC's Valuation (70) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as AIPUF (82) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIPUF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (25) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as AIPUF (52) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIPUF (82) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIPUF (91) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than AIPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIPUFPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCV29.910.21
+0.71%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF
IDMO50.730.19
+0.38%
Invesco S&P International Dev Momt ETF
FXB131.200.19
+0.15%
Invesco CcyShrs® British Pound Stlg
PUTW30.15N/A
N/A
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
JCTR80.93N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Eq ETF

AIPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIPUF and BLDE have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIPUF and BLDE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIPUF
1D Price
Change %
AIPUF100%
N/A
BLDE - AIPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
ASR - AIPUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
PAC - AIPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
AEOXF - AIPUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACKDF - AIPUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
-0.97%
ASR - PAC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
OMAB - PAC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
CAAP - PAC
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
ASLE - PAC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLDE - PAC
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More