AIP
Price
$9.23
Change
+$0.14 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
387.45M
25 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$65.89
Change
+$0.89 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.08B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIP vs RMBS

Header iconAIP vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts AIP vs RMBSBanner chart's image
Arteris
Price$9.23
Change+$0.14 (+1.54%)
Volume$212.42K
Capitalization387.45M
Rambus
Price$65.89
Change+$0.89 (+1.37%)
Volume$664.65K
Capitalization7.08B
AIP vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIP vs. RMBS commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIP is a Hold and RMBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AIP: $9.23 vs. RMBS: $65.89)
Brand notoriety: AIP and RMBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIP: 52% vs. RMBS: 69%
Market capitalization -- AIP: $387.45M vs. RMBS: $7.08B
AIP [@Semiconductors] is valued at $387.45M. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $7.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.89T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $59.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than AIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the short-term than AIP.

Price Growth

AIP (@Semiconductors) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +5.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+3.64% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBS($7.08B) has a higher market cap than AIP($387M). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 24.650 vs. AIP (-9.421). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 276M vs. AIP (-23.62M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 514M vs. AIP (42.3M). AIP has less debt than RMBS: AIP (6.29M) vs RMBS (29.2M). RMBS has higher revenues than AIP: RMBS (605M) vs AIP (61.3M).
AIPRMBSAIP / RMBS
Capitalization387M7.08B5%
EBITDA-23.62M276M-9%
Gain YTD-9.42124.650-38%
P/E RatioN/A34.50-
Revenue61.3M605M10%
Total Cash42.3M514M8%
Total Debt6.29M29.2M22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIPRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BYDDY93.710.38
+0.41%
BYD Co., Ltd.
KMMPF14.21N/A
N/A
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr
KNAMF135.23N/A
N/A
KONAMI GROUP CORP.
KOREF0.02N/A
N/A
Kore Mining Ltd.
TYFG44.00N/A
N/A
Tri County Financial Group Inc.

AIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIP has been loosely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIP jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIP
1D Price
Change %
AIP100%
+1.54%
RMBS - AIP
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
SYNA - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
NVDA - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
MTSI - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
AMKR - AIP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+1.37%
LRCX - RMBS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
KLIC - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
AMKR - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
QCOM - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
KLAC - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.86%
More