AIP
Price
$8.86
Change
-$0.46 (-4.94%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
371.92M
9 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$62.85
Change
-$1.36 (-2.12%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.75B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIP vs RMBS

Header iconAIP vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts AIP vs RMBSBanner chart's image
Arteris
Price$8.86
Change-$0.46 (-4.94%)
Volume$281.46K
Capitalization371.92M
Rambus
Price$62.85
Change-$1.36 (-2.12%)
Volume$974.17K
Capitalization6.75B
AIP vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIP vs. RMBS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIP is a Hold and RMBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AIP: $8.86 vs. RMBS: $62.85)
Brand notoriety: AIP and RMBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIP: 64% vs. RMBS: 105%
Market capitalization -- AIP: $371.92M vs. RMBS: $6.75B
AIP [@Semiconductors] is valued at $371.92M. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $6.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.23T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than AIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIP is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS.

Price Growth

AIP (@Semiconductors) experienced а -9.78% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was -7.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.33% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBS($6.75B) has a higher market cap than AIP($372M). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 18.899 vs. AIP (-13.052). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 276M vs. AIP (-23.62M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 514M vs. AIP (42.3M). AIP has less debt than RMBS: AIP (6.29M) vs RMBS (29.2M). RMBS has higher revenues than AIP: RMBS (605M) vs AIP (61.3M).
AIPRMBSAIP / RMBS
Capitalization372M6.75B6%
EBITDA-23.62M276M-9%
Gain YTD-13.05218.899-69%
P/E RatioN/A32.91-
Revenue61.3M605M10%
Total Cash42.3M514M8%
Total Debt6.29M29.2M22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIPRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSHLX52.450.48
+0.92%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth L
KLCSX20.860.13
+0.63%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
SLLAX13.010.07
+0.54%
SEI Small Cap F (SIMT)
VIGIX233.761.04
+0.45%
Vanguard Growth Index Institutional
RGAVX14.52-0.01
-0.07%
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc A

AIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIP has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIP jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIP
1D Price
Change %
AIP100%
-4.94%
RMBS - AIP
67%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
NVDA - AIP
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
MTSI - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
MU - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
SYNA - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-2.12%
LRCX - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
KLIC - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
AMKR - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
QCOM - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
VECO - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
More