AIP
Price
$8.86
Change
-$0.46 (-4.94%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
371.92M
9 days until earnings call
MU
Price
$111.26
Change
-$0.47 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
124.51B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIP vs MU

Header iconAIP vs MU Comparison
Open Charts AIP vs MUBanner chart's image
Arteris
Price$8.86
Change-$0.46 (-4.94%)
Volume$281.46K
Capitalization371.92M
Micron Technology
Price$111.26
Change-$0.47 (-0.42%)
Volume$16.37M
Capitalization124.51B
AIP vs MU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIP vs. MU commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIP is a Hold and MU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AIP: $8.86 vs. MU: $111.26)
Brand notoriety: AIP: Not notable vs. MU: Notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIP: 64% vs. MU: 73%
Market capitalization -- AIP: $371.92M vs. MU: $124.51B
AIP [@Semiconductors] is valued at $371.92M. MU’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $124.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.23T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than AIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIP is a better buy in the short-term than MU.

Price Growth

AIP (@Semiconductors) experienced а -9.78% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

MU is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.33% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($125B) has a higher market cap than AIP($372M). MU YTD gains are higher at: 32.497 vs. AIP (-13.052). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. AIP (-23.62M). MU has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. AIP (42.3M). AIP has less debt than MU: AIP (6.29M) vs MU (16.1B). MU has higher revenues than AIP: MU (33.8B) vs AIP (61.3M).
AIPMUAIP / MU
Capitalization372M125B0%
EBITDA-23.62M16.2B-0%
Gain YTD-13.05232.497-40%
P/E RatioN/A20.05-
Revenue61.3M33.8B0%
Total Cash42.3M10.8B0%
Total Debt6.29M16.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU: Fundamental Ratings
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIPMU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCT.X0.0003820.000041
+11.95%
TokenClub cryptocurrency
ENS.X30.3922861.848942
+6.48%
Ethereum Name Service cryptocurrency
NMR.X8.893363-0.018850
-0.21%
Numeraire cryptocurrency
DGB.X0.009558-0.000092
-0.95%
DigiByte cryptocurrency
DATA.X0.017030-0.000456
-2.61%
Streamr cryptocurrency

AIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIP has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIP jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIP
1D Price
Change %
AIP100%
-4.94%
RMBS - AIP
67%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
NVDA - AIP
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
MTSI - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
MU - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
SYNA - AIP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
-0.42%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
RMBS - MU
74%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
AMAT - MU
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
ASX - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
More