AINSF
Price
$0.62
Change
+$0.01 (+1.64%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
222.18M
BLBRF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.05 (-29.41%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
749.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AINSF vs BLBRF

Header iconAINSF vs BLBRF Comparison
Open Charts AINSF vs BLBRFBanner chart's image
Ainsworth Game Technology
Price$0.62
Change+$0.01 (+1.64%)
Volume$42K
Capitalization222.18M
Bloomberry Resorts
Price$0.12
Change-$0.05 (-29.41%)
Volume$47K
Capitalization749.55M
AINSF vs BLBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AINSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AINSF vs. BLBRF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AINSF is a Hold and BLBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (AINSF: $0.62 vs. BLBRF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: AINSF and BLBRF are both not notable
AINSF represents the Casinos/Gaming, while BLBRF is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AINSF: 230% vs. BLBRF: 249%
Market capitalization -- AINSF: $222.18M vs. BLBRF: $749.55M
AINSF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $222.18M. BLBRF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $749.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $49.39B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AINSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBLBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AINSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BLBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AINSF is a better buy in the long-term than BLBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AINSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AINSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AINSF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -6.99% price change this week, while BLBRF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.99% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.66% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLBRF($750M) has a higher market cap than AINSF($222M). BLBRF has higher P/E ratio than AINSF: BLBRF (20.84) vs AINSF (10.60). AINSF YTD gains are higher at: 23.007 vs. BLBRF (-30.706).
AINSFBLBRFAINSF / BLBRF
Capitalization222M750M30%
EBITDAN/A19.2B-
Gain YTD23.007-30.706-75%
P/E Ratio10.6020.8451%
RevenueN/A54.7B-
Total CashN/A29.2B-
Total DebtN/A107B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AINSF: Fundamental Ratings
AINSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AINSFBLBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AINSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACEKX10.930.04
+0.37%
Invesco Equity and Income R5
FIKEX59.830.06
+0.10%
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Z
MGQSX18.12-0.03
-0.17%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars R6
JBSOX22.91-0.08
-0.35%
JHancock New Opportunities C
PEGEX21.25-0.27
-1.25%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R2

AINSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AINSF and BRSL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AINSF and BRSL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AINSF
1D Price
Change %
AINSF100%
+1.03%
BRSL - AINSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRRE - AINSF
10%
Poorly correlated
-18.70%
AGTEF - AINSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSI - AINSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
BLBRF - AINSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BLBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLBRF and AINSF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLBRF and AINSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLBRF
1D Price
Change %
BLBRF100%
N/A
AINSF - BLBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
ARLUF - BLBRF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
AGTEF - BLBRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHGRF - BLBRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARHN - BLBRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More