Advertisement
AIN vs CGGGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIN is a Hold and CGGGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CGGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGGGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CGGGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AIN (@Textiles) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while CGGGF (@Textiles) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Textiles (-0.66% weekly)The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
| AIN | CGGGF | AIN / CGGGF | |
| Capitalization | 1.61B | 2.27B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 50.2M | 285M | 18% |
| Gain YTD | 10.868 | 9.259 | 117% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.16 | 22.87 | 119% |
| Revenue | 1.15B | 1.5B | 76% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 481M | 670M | 72% |
AIN | CGGGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGGGF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIN (89) in the Textiles industry. This means that CGGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIN’s over the last 12 months.
CGGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIN (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that CGGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIN’s over the last 12 months.
CGGGF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AIN (92) in the Textiles industry. This means that CGGGF’s stock grew similarly to AIN’s over the last 12 months.
CGGGF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AIN (59) in the Textiles industry. This means that CGGGF’s stock grew similarly to AIN’s over the last 12 months.
CGGGF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as AIN (33) in the Textiles industry. This means that CGGGF’s stock grew similarly to AIN’s over the last 12 months.
| AIN | CGGGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 29% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PLVJX | 17.47 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| Principal Large Cap Value III J | |||
| PIEFX | 22.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Eq IS | |||
| PRHSX | 82.41 | -0.83 | -1.00% |
| T. Rowe Price Health Sciences | |||
| EIHSX | 13.75 | -0.18 | -1.29% |
| Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I | |||
| KCGSX | 23.20 | -0.32 | -1.36% |
| Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S | |||
AIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIN and TRYIY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIN and TRYIY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIN | 100% | -0.92% | ||
| TRYIY - AIN | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| CULP - AIN | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| UFI - AIN | 17% Poorly correlated | +4.59% | ||
| SHZHY - AIN | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
| TRYIF - AIN | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CGGGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGGGF and TRYIY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGGGF and TRYIY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGGF | 100% | -2.48% | ||
| TRYIY - CGGGF | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| LNZNF - CGGGF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SZHIF - CGGGF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRYIF - CGGGF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIN - CGGGF | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
More | ||||