AIMUF
Price
$4.01
Change
-$15.25 (-79.18%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
BOWN
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
95.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIMUF vs BOWN

Header iconAIMUF vs BOWN Comparison
Open Charts AIMUF vs BOWNBanner chart's image
Aimfinity Investment Corp I
Price$4.01
Change-$15.25 (-79.18%)
Volume$105
CapitalizationN/A
Bowen Acquisition
Price$10.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Volume$546
Capitalization95.42M
AIMUF vs BOWN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMUF vs. BOWN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMUF is a Buy and BOWN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AIMUF: $4.01 vs. BOWN: $10.10)
Brand notoriety: AIMUF and BOWN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMUF: 38% vs. BOWN: 6%
Market capitalization -- AIMUF: $0 vs. BOWN: $95.42M
AIMUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. BOWN’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $95.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBOWN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOWN is a better buy in the long-term than AIMUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIMUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BOWN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIMUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • BOWN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIMUF is a better buy in the short-term than BOWN.

Price Growth

AIMUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +16.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWN YTD gains are higher at: -7.509 vs. AIMUF (-68.987). BOWN has more cash in the bank: 501K vs. AIMUF (5.5K).
AIMUFBOWNAIMUF / BOWN
CapitalizationN/A95.4M-
EBITDA-1.61MN/A-
Gain YTD-68.987-7.509919%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash5.5K501K1%
Total Debt255KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIMUFBOWN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRSNF0.030.01
+36.00%
Personas Social Inc
BPOPO24.650.05
+0.20%
Popular, Inc.
MOHCY12.04N/A
N/A
Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries S.A.
JRNGF1.48-0.02
-1.37%
Journey Energy Inc.
XROLF110.78-3.18
-2.79%
Xero Ltd.

AIMUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMUF and MLAC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMUF and MLAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMUF
1D Price
Change %
AIMUF100%
N/A
MLAC - AIMUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZLU - AIMUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
HSPOU - AIMUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - AIMUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
SRNW - AIMUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.81%
More

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOWN and MSSAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOWN and MSSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
-0.98%
MSSAF - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
HSPOU - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMV - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KACUF - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More