AIMUF
Price
$4.01
Change
-$15.25 (-79.18%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
BBOE
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
364.5K
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIMUF vs BBOE

Header iconAIMUF vs BBOE Comparison
Open Charts AIMUF vs BBOEBanner chart's image
Aimfinity Investment Corp. I
Price$4.01
Change-$15.25 (-79.18%)
Volume$105
CapitalizationN/A
Black Box Entertainment
Price$1.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.99%)
Volume$200
Capitalization364.5K
AIMUF vs BBOE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMUF vs. BBOE commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMUF is a Buy and BBOE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (AIMUF: $4.01 vs. BBOE: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: AIMUF and BBOE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMUF: 32% vs. BBOE: 37%
Market capitalization -- AIMUF: $0 vs. BBOE: $364.5K
AIMUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. BBOE’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $364.5K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBBOE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BBOE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIMUF and BBOE are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIMUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBOE’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIMUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • BBOE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIMUF is a better buy in the short-term than BBOE.

Price Growth

AIMUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BBOE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.90% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBOE YTD gains are higher at: -41.176 vs. AIMUF (-68.987). BBOE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -88.81K vs. AIMUF (-1.61M). BBOE has more cash in the bank: 79.9K vs. AIMUF (5.5K). AIMUF has less debt than BBOE: AIMUF (255K) vs BBOE (1.69M). BBOE has higher revenues than AIMUF: BBOE (3.69M) vs AIMUF (0).
AIMUFBBOEAIMUF / BBOE
CapitalizationN/A365K-
EBITDA-1.61M-88.81K1,817%
Gain YTD-68.987-41.176168%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue03.69M-
Total Cash5.5K79.9K7%
Total Debt255K1.69M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBOE: Fundamental Ratings
BBOE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIMUFBBOE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPBK12.890.43
+3.45%
OP Bancorp
MOH297.055.99
+2.06%
Molina Healthcare
PSMT106.350.10
+0.09%
PriceSmart
GITS1.38N/A
N/A
Global Interactive Technologies Inc
KC12.58-0.38
-2.93%
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited

AIMUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMUF and MLAC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMUF and MLAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMUF
1D Price
Change %
AIMUF100%
N/A
MLAC - AIMUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
SZZLU - AIMUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
HSPOU - AIMUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - AIMUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-11.33%
SRNW - AIMUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.10%
More

BBOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBOE and VMCAF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBOE and VMCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBOE
1D Price
Change %
BBOE100%
N/A
VMCAF - BBOE
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - BBOE
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSUF - BBOE
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVIIU - BBOE
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMUF - BBOE
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More