AIMLF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.68M
ZETA
Price
$18.00
Change
-$0.73 (-3.90%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.46B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIMLF vs ZETA

Header iconAIMLF vs ZETA Comparison
Open Charts AIMLF vs ZETABanner chart's image
AI / ML Innovations
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.13K
Capitalization5.68M
Zeta Global Holdings
Price$18.00
Change-$0.73 (-3.90%)
Volume$145.05K
Capitalization4.46B
AIMLF vs ZETA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZETA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMLF vs. ZETA commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMLF is a Hold and ZETA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (AIMLF: $0.03 vs. ZETA: $18.73)
Brand notoriety: AIMLF and ZETA are both not notable
AIMLF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while ZETA is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMLF: 12% vs. ZETA: 133%
Market capitalization -- AIMLF: $5.68M vs. ZETA: $4.46B
AIMLF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $5.68M. ZETA’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $46.1B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZETA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZETA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZETA is a better buy in the long-term than AIMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZETA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZETA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIMLF is a better buy in the short-term than ZETA.

Price Growth

AIMLF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while ZETA (@Computer Communications) price change was +19.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZETA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.49% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZETA($4.46B) has a higher market cap than AIMLF($5.68M). ZETA YTD gains are higher at: 4.113 vs. AIMLF (-66.228). ZETA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.17M vs. AIMLF (-3.99M). ZETA has more cash in the bank: 364M vs. AIMLF (1.86M). AIMLF has less debt than ZETA: AIMLF (203K) vs ZETA (196M). ZETA has higher revenues than AIMLF: ZETA (1.08B) vs AIMLF (201K).
AIMLFZETAAIMLF / ZETA
Capitalization5.68M4.46B0%
EBITDA-3.99M9.17M-44%
Gain YTD-66.2284.113-1,610%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue201K1.08B0%
Total Cash1.86M364M1%
Total Debt203K196M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIMLF: Fundamental Ratings
AIMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIMLFZETA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZETA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REYN22.850.34
+1.51%
Reynolds Consumer Products
CI274.903.90
+1.44%
Cigna Group (The)
PLSE14.71-0.01
-0.07%
Pulse Biosciences
FBLA11.25-0.05
-0.44%
FB Bancorp Inc
LEE4.36-0.10
-2.15%
Lee Enterprises

AIMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMLF and BWLKF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMLF and BWLKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMLF
1D Price
Change %
AIMLF100%
+0.68%
BWLKF - AIMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
AICOF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+21.18%
IARGF - AIMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZETA - AIMLF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.34%
VMEO - AIMLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.59%
More

ZETA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZETA has been loosely correlated with PSFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZETA jumps, then PSFE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZETA
1D Price
Change %
ZETA100%
-4.34%
PSFE - ZETA
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
EVCM - ZETA
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.72%
PLUS - ZETA
48%
Loosely correlated
+9.42%
PGY - ZETA
45%
Loosely correlated
-6.37%
APP - ZETA
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
More