AIMLF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZETA
Price
$16.93
Change
-$0.80 (-4.51%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.36B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIMLF vs ZETA

Header iconAIMLF vs ZETA Comparison
Open Charts AIMLF vs ZETABanner chart's image
AI / ML Innovations
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$519
Capitalization7.43M
Zeta Global Holdings
Price$16.93
Change-$0.80 (-4.51%)
Volume$7.88K
Capitalization4.36B
AIMLF vs ZETA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMLF vs. ZETA commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMLF is a Buy and ZETA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AIMLF: $0.03 vs. ZETA: $17.72)
Brand notoriety: AIMLF and ZETA are both not notable
AIMLF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while ZETA is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMLF: 1% vs. ZETA: 229%
Market capitalization -- AIMLF: $7.43M vs. ZETA: $4.36B
AIMLF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $7.43M. ZETA’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $31.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.05T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $1.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZETA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZETA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZETA is a better buy in the long-term than AIMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIMLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZETA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIMLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ZETA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIMLF is a better buy in the short-term than ZETA.

Price Growth

AIMLF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +5.87% price change this week, while ZETA (@Computer Communications) price change was -11.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -4.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.84%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZETA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-4.74% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (-0.31% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZETA($4.36B) has a higher market cap than AIMLF($7.43M). AIMLF YTD gains are higher at: 8.755 vs. ZETA (-12.924). ZETA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68.7M vs. AIMLF (-6.5M). ZETA has more cash in the bank: 385M vs. AIMLF (1.13M). AIMLF has less debt than ZETA: AIMLF (183K) vs ZETA (197M). ZETA has higher revenues than AIMLF: ZETA (1.23B) vs AIMLF (168K).
AIMLFZETAAIMLF / ZETA
Capitalization7.43M4.36B0%
EBITDA-6.5M68.7M-9%
Gain YTD8.755-12.924-68%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue168K1.23B0%
Total Cash1.13M385M0%
Total Debt183K197M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIMLF: Fundamental Ratings
AIMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIMLFZETA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIMLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZETA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHM76.192.91
+3.97%
Graham Corp
IRD2.400.08
+3.45%
Opus Genetics Inc
NTR70.411.72
+2.50%
Nutrien Ltd
LESL1.31-0.08
-5.76%
Leslie's Inc
PJT160.62-13.38
-7.69%
PJT Partners

AIMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMLF and BWLKF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMLF and BWLKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMLF
1D Price
Change %
AIMLF100%
+2.76%
BWLKF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+23.75%
IARGF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AICOF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
ZETA - AIMLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
MNDY - AIMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-9.85%
More

ZETA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZETA has been loosely correlated with FIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZETA jumps, then FIVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZETA
1D Price
Change %
ZETA100%
-5.14%
FIVN - ZETA
54%
Loosely correlated
-7.06%
EVCM - ZETA
53%
Loosely correlated
-8.56%
COIN - ZETA
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.36%
RAMP - ZETA
51%
Loosely correlated
-8.32%
PGY - ZETA
50%
Loosely correlated
-6.13%
More