AIMFF
Price
$2.28
Change
-$0.02 (-0.87%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
209.89M
FFXXF
Price
$2.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
216.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIMFF vs FFXXF

Header iconAIMFF vs FFXXF Comparison
Open Charts AIMFF vs FFXXFBanner chart's image
Aimia
Price$2.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.87%)
Volume$21.1K
Capitalization209.89M
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$2.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.93K
Capitalization216.58M
AIMFF vs FFXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMFF vs. FFXXF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMFF is a Hold and FFXXF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AIMFF: $2.28 vs. FFXXF: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: AIMFF and FFXXF are both not notable
AIMFF represents the Chemicals: Specialty, while FFXXF is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMFF: 61% vs. FFXXF: 360%
Market capitalization -- AIMFF: $209.89M vs. FFXXF: $216.58M
AIMFF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $209.89M. FFXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $216.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $225.11B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIMFF is a better buy in the long-term than FFXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIMFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIMFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXXF is a better buy in the short-term than AIMFF.

Price Growth

AIMFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.79% price change this week, while FFXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +4.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+4.02% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXXF($217M) and AIMFF($210M) have the same market capitalization . AIMFF YTD gains are higher at: 22.581 vs. FFXXF (-1.471). FFXXF has less debt than AIMFF: FFXXF (461K) vs AIMFF (314M). AIMFF has higher revenues than FFXXF: AIMFF (497M) vs FFXXF (-18.31M).
AIMFFFFXXFAIMFF / FFXXF
Capitalization210M217M97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.581-1.471-1,535%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue497M-18.31M-2,714%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt314M461K68,113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIMFF vs FFXXF: Fundamental Ratings
AIMFF
FFXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
9294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4484
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6149
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIMFF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (75). This means that AIMFF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

AIMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (100). This means that AIMFF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

AIMFF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (94). This means that AIMFF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

AIMFF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (84). This means that AIMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as AIMFF (61). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to AIMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIMFFFFXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHECX15.500.09
+0.58%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate C
MXIGX14.280.03
+0.21%
Empower International Growth Inv
RYEIX248.460.47
+0.19%
Rydex Energy Inv
IFPUX22.77-0.02
-0.09%
Independent Franchise Partners US Equity
AEIUX8.97-0.01
-0.11%
American Century Equity Income R5

AIMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMFF and ONEXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMFF and ONEXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMFF
1D Price
Change %
AIMFF100%
-0.87%
ONEXF - AIMFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
FNNCF - AIMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
SAMG - AIMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
TETAA - AIMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - AIMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and FFXDF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and FFXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
N/A
FFXDF - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
MGLD - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
AIMFF - FFXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
FRMO - FFXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
GLAE - FFXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More