AILQF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.02 (-7.69%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
7.84M
PANW
Price
$191.53
Change
+$1.01 (+0.53%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
128.11B
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AILQF vs PANW

Header iconAILQF vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts AILQF vs PANWBanner chart's image
AirIQ
Price$0.24
Change-$0.02 (-7.69%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization7.84M
Palo Alto Networks
Price$191.53
Change+$1.01 (+0.53%)
Volume$5.48M
Capitalization128.11B
AILQF vs PANW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AILQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AILQF vs. PANW commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AILQF is a Hold and PANW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AILQF: $0.24 vs. PANW: $191.53)
Brand notoriety: AILQF: Not notable vs. PANW: Notable
AILQF represents the Packaged Software, while PANW is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AILQF: 41% vs. PANW: 61%
Market capitalization -- AILQF: $7.84M vs. PANW: $128.11B
AILQF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.84M. PANW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $128.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.76T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AILQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AILQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than AILQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AILQF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AILQF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the short-term than AILQF.

Price Growth

AILQF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($128B) has a higher market cap than AILQF($7.84M). PANW has higher P/E ratio than AILQF: PANW (119.71) vs AILQF (51.87). PANW YTD gains are higher at: 4.704 vs. AILQF (-14.591). PANW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.66B vs. AILQF (1.05M). PANW has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. AILQF (3.1M). PANW has higher revenues than AILQF: PANW (8.88B) vs AILQF (5.44M).
AILQFPANWAILQF / PANW
Capitalization7.84M128B0%
EBITDA1.05M1.66B0%
Gain YTD-14.5914.704-310%
P/E Ratio51.87119.7143%
Revenue5.44M8.88B0%
Total Cash3.1M3.3B0%
Total DebtN/A729M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AILQF vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
AILQF
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7814
SMR RATING
1..100
8643
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AILQF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PANW (88) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AILQF’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AILQF (78) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AILQF’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's SMR Rating (43) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AILQF (86) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AILQF’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as AILQF (59) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to AILQF’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as AILQF (7) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to AILQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AILQFPANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AILQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTLA11.710.31
+2.72%
Intellia Therapeutics
UNP221.76-0.23
-0.10%
Union Pacific Corp
STRT65.67-0.57
-0.86%
STRATTEC SECURITY Corp
ESI25.13-0.31
-1.22%
Element Solutions
USIO1.41-0.04
-2.76%
Usio

AILQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AILQF and PANW have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AILQF and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AILQF
1D Price
Change %
AILQF100%
N/A
PANW - AILQF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
VERB - AILQF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSASF - AILQF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
RDZN - AILQF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
CMDXF - AILQF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
More

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
N/A
CRWD - PANW
68%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
ZS - PANW
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
CYBR - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FTNT - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
ADSK - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
More