It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -1.90% price change this week, while GSHD (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -2.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.62%.
AIG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
GSHD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
AIG | GSHD | AIG / GSHD | |
Capitalization | 53.2B | 1.73B | 3,079% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 8.681 | 51.636 | 17% |
P/E Ratio | 15.59 | 125.22 | 12% |
Revenue | 47.3B | 261M | 18,123% |
Total Cash | 251B | 42M | 597,619% |
Total Debt | 22.4B | 143M | 15,664% |
AIG | GSHD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIG's Valuation (46) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSHD (100) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSHD’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as GSHD (57) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to GSHD’s over the last 12 months.
GSHD's SMR Rating (28) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that GSHD’s stock grew significantly faster than AIG’s over the last 12 months.
GSHD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as AIG (56) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that GSHD’s stock grew similarly to AIG’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSHD (75) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSHD’s over the last 12 months.
AIG | GSHD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago66% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago55% | 3 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIG has been loosely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHD and SLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHD and SLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GSHD | 100% | -0.25% | ||
SLF - GSHD | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
ESGR - GSHD | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
ORI - GSHD | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
AIG - GSHD | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
EQH - GSHD | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More |