AIG
Price
$75.09
Change
+$0.48 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.23B
25 days until earnings call
FIHL
Price
$16.63
Change
-$0.07 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.26B
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIG vs FIHL

Header iconAIG vs FIHL Comparison
Open Charts AIG vs FIHLBanner chart's image
American International Group
Price$75.09
Change+$0.48 (+0.64%)
Volume$4.9M
Capitalization53.23B
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$16.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
Volume$3.8K
Capitalization2.26B
AIG vs FIHL Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIG vs. FIHL commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIG is a Hold and FIHL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AIG: $74.61 vs. FIHL: $16.70)
Brand notoriety: AIG: Notable vs. FIHL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIG: 111% vs. FIHL: 57%
Market capitalization -- AIG: $53.23B vs. FIHL: $2.26B
AIG [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $53.23B. FIHL’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFIHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIG is a better buy in the long-term than FIHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIHL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FIHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FIHL is a better buy in the short-term than AIG.

Price Growth

AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +4.45% price change this week, while FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

FIHL is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+2.42% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIG($53.2B) has a higher market cap than FIHL($2.26B). AIG has higher P/E ratio than FIHL: AIG (15.59) vs FIHL (1.03). AIG YTD gains are higher at: 2.486 vs. FIHL (-7.887). AIG has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. FIHL (4.01B). FIHL has less debt than AIG: FIHL (448M) vs AIG (22.4B). AIG has higher revenues than FIHL: AIG (47.3B) vs FIHL (3.59B).
AIGFIHLAIG / FIHL
Capitalization53.2B2.26B2,351%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.486-7.887-32%
P/E Ratio15.591.031,510%
Revenue47.3B3.59B1,317%
Total Cash251B4.01B6,266%
Total Debt22.4B448M5,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIG: Fundamental Ratings
AIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIGFIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

AIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIG has been loosely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIG
1D Price
Change %
AIG100%
+2.11%
EQH - AIG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
ORI - AIG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
SLF - AIG
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AEG - AIG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
ACGL - AIG
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
More

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
+0.24%
AIG - FIHL
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
ORI - FIHL
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
AVVIY - FIHL
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
ACGL - FIHL
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
EQH - FIHL
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More