AIG
Price
$80.01
Change
-$0.30 (-0.37%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
44.33B
73 days until earnings call
FGNXP
Price
$20.80
Change
+$0.77 (+3.84%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIG vs FGNXP

Header iconAIG vs FGNXP Comparison
Open Charts AIG vs FGNXPBanner chart's image
American International Group
Price$80.01
Change-$0.30 (-0.37%)
Volume$3.44M
Capitalization44.33B
Fundamental Global
Price$20.80
Change+$0.77 (+3.84%)
Volume$1.33K
CapitalizationN/A
AIG vs FGNXP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGNXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIG vs. FGNXP commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIG is a Hold and FGNXP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AIG: $80.01 vs. FGNXP: $20.80)
Brand notoriety: AIG: Notable vs. FGNXP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIG: 79% vs. FGNXP: 38%
Market capitalization -- AIG: $44.33B vs. FGNXP: $0
AIG [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $44.33B. FGNXP’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGNXP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGNXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIG is a better buy in the long-term than FGNXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGNXP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FGNXP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIG is a better buy in the short-term than FGNXP.

Price Growth

AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while FGNXP (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+2.25% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNXP YTD gains are higher at: 34.628 vs. AIG (11.018).
AIGFGNXPAIG / FGNXP
Capitalization44.3BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.01834.62832%
P/E Ratio14.96N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.75BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIG vs FGNXP: Fundamental Ratings
AIG
FGNXP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1124
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGNXP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIG (55) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that FGNXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIG’s over the last 12 months.

AIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew significantly faster than FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

AIG's SMR Rating (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

FGNXP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as AIG (55) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that FGNXP’s stock grew similarly to AIG’s over the last 12 months.

AIG's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIGFGNXP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGNXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DJTU10.740.96
+9.82%
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF
SPEM44.340.15
+0.34%
SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
XHYF37.800.01
+0.03%
BondBloxx US Hg Yld Fncl & REIT Str ETF
NBSM25.57-0.20
-0.77%
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
DPST93.18-5.09
-5.18%
Direxion Daily Regional Bnks Bull 3X ETF

AIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIG has been closely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIG jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIG
1D Price
Change %
AIG100%
-0.37%
ORI - AIG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
SLF - AIG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
EQH - AIG
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
BNT - AIG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
FIHL - AIG
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.85%
More

FGNXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGNXP and ACGL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGNXP and ACGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGNXP
1D Price
Change %
FGNXP100%
+3.84%
ACGL - FGNXP
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
ORI - FGNXP
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
ACGLO - FGNXP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
AIG - FGNXP
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
ACGLN - FGNXP
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More