AIG
Price
$78.77
Change
+$0.62 (+0.79%)
Updated
Aug 11, 11:33 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.28B
79 days until earnings call
BNT
Price
$64.27
Change
-$0.58 (-0.89%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.73B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIG vs BNT

Header iconAIG vs BNT Comparison
Open Charts AIG vs BNTBanner chart's image
American International Group
Price$78.77
Change+$0.62 (+0.79%)
Volume$9.2K
Capitalization43.28B
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$64.27
Change-$0.58 (-0.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.73B
AIG vs BNT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIG vs. BNT commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIG is a StrongBuy and BNT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (AIG: $78.15 vs. BNT: $64.85)
Brand notoriety: AIG: Notable vs. BNT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIG: 96% vs. BNT: 120%
Market capitalization -- AIG: $43.28B vs. BNT: $15.73B
AIG [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $43.28B. BNT’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $15.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIG is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BNT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIG is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.44% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIG($43.3B) has a higher market cap than BNT($15.7B). AIG has higher P/E ratio than BNT: AIG (14.60) vs BNT (10.91). BNT YTD gains are higher at: 13.281 vs. AIG (8.437). BNT has less debt than AIG: BNT (4.53B) vs AIG (8.75B).
AIGBNTAIG / BNT
Capitalization43.3B15.7B276%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.43713.28164%
P/E Ratio14.6010.91134%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.75B4.53B193%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIG: Fundamental Ratings
AIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIGBNT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TARK62.470.60
+0.97%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
NXG47.300.23
+0.49%
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
SPSM43.250.15
+0.35%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Sm Cap ETF
GXDW25.75-0.06
-0.23%
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
DGCB54.56-0.17
-0.32%
Dimensional Global Credit ETF

AIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIG has been closely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIG jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIG
1D Price
Change %
AIG100%
+2.02%
ORI - AIG
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
SLF - AIG
52%
Loosely correlated
-8.05%
EQH - AIG
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
BNT - AIG
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FIHL - AIG
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
More

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
N/A
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
MKL - BNT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
AEG - BNT
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
KMPR - BNT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More