AIFLY
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.23 (-14.11%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FOA
Price
$22.90
Change
-$0.11 (-0.48%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
180.61M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIFLY vs FOA

Header iconAIFLY vs FOA Comparison
Open Charts AIFLY vs FOABanner chart's image
Aiful
Price$1.40
Change-$0.23 (-14.11%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.56B
Finance of America Companies
Price$22.90
Change-$0.11 (-0.48%)
Volume$85.18K
Capitalization180.61M
AIFLY vs FOA Comparison Chart in %
AIFLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFLY vs. FOA commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLY is a Hold and FOA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFLY: $1.40 vs. FOA: $23.01)
Brand notoriety: AIFLY and FOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFLY: 100% vs. FOA: 45%
Market capitalization -- AIFLY: $1.56B vs. FOA: $180.61M
AIFLY [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.56B. FOA’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $180.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $648.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFOA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FOA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIFLY and FOA are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFLY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the short-term than AIFLY.

Price Growth

AIFLY (@Savings Banks) experienced а -14.11% price change this week, while FOA (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.14% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIFLY($1.56B) has a higher market cap than FOA($181M). AIFLY has higher P/E ratio than FOA: AIFLY (7.39) vs FOA (3.17). AIFLY YTD gains are higher at: 47.368 vs. FOA (-18.172). FOA has less debt than AIFLY: FOA (29.5B) vs AIFLY (723B). AIFLY has higher revenues than FOA: AIFLY (175B) vs FOA (454M).
AIFLYFOAAIFLY / FOA
Capitalization1.56B181M860%
EBITDA28BN/A-
Gain YTD47.368-18.172-261%
P/E Ratio7.393.17233%
Revenue175B454M38,546%
Total Cash51.8BN/A-
Total Debt723B29.5B2,451%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFLY vs FOA: Fundamental Ratings
AIFLY
FOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
977
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8589
SMR RATING
1..100
6318
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
294
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOA's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFLY (31). This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

AIFLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FOA (89). This means that AIFLY’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIFLY (63). This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

AIFLY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FOA (56). This means that AIFLY’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFLY (29). This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFLYFOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIFLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFAVX14.450.09
+0.63%
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value I
PABVX16.200.06
+0.37%
Principal MidCap Value I R5
GQETX37.360.12
+0.32%
GMO Quality III
NFALX37.270.11
+0.30%
Neuberger Berman Focus I
MGOTX8.960.01
+0.11%
Victory Mid-Cap Core Growth C

AIFLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLY and ALTG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLY and ALTG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFLY
1D Price
Change %
AIFLY100%
N/A
ALTG - AIFLY
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.77%
FOA - AIFLY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
FINV - AIFLY
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
AEOJF - AIFLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACCFF - AIFLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOA and YRD have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOA and YRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
-1.54%
YRD - FOA
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
SOFI - FOA
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.07%
CACC - FOA
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
PYPL - FOA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
AGM - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More