AIFLF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$1.21 (+65.76%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
IMPM
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.83M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIFLF vs IMPM

Header iconAIFLF vs IMPM Comparison
Open Charts AIFLF vs IMPMBanner chart's image
Aiful
Price$3.05
Change+$1.21 (+65.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.23B
Impac Mortgage Holdings
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50.35K
Capitalization2.83M
AIFLF vs IMPM Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFLF vs. IMPM commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLF is a Hold and IMPM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFLF: $3.05 vs. IMPM: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AIFLF and IMPM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFLF: 100% vs. IMPM: 42%
Market capitalization -- AIFLF: $1.23B vs. IMPM: $2.83M
AIFLF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.23B. IMPM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIMPM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IMPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIFLF is a better buy in the long-term than IMPM.

Price Growth

AIFLF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IMPM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

IMPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIFLF($1.23B) has a higher market cap than IMPM($2.83M). AIFLF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IMPM (-21.771).
AIFLFIMPMAIFLF / IMPM
Capitalization1.23B2.83M43,296%
EBITDA15BN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-21.771-
P/E Ratio7.62N/A-
Revenue141BN/A-
Total Cash61.7BN/A-
Total Debt547BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMPM: Fundamental Ratings
IMPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

AIFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLF and DWIS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLF and DWIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFLF
1D Price
Change %
AIFLF100%
N/A
DWIS - AIFLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHGKY - AIFLF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMPM - AIFLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPFI - AIFLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
RBRI - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IMPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMPM and AIFLF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMPM and AIFLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMPM
1D Price
Change %
IMPM100%
N/A
AIFLF - IMPM
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MWG - IMPM
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
DWAY - IMPM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSTS - IMPM
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
PRLPF - IMPM
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More