Advertisement
AIFLF vs CCGFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLF is a Hold and CCGFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCGFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AIFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CCGFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
AIFLF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCGFF (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.73%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-0.19% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| AIFLF | CCGFF | AIFLF / CCGFF | |
| Capitalization | 1.55B | 770M | 202% |
| EBITDA | 28B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 10.09 | 22.21 | 45% |
| Revenue | 175B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 51.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 723B | N/A | - |
| AIFLF | CCGFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 3% | 4 days ago 4% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 4% | 4 days ago 4% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
AIFLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLF and DWIS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLF and DWIS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIFLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DWIS - AIFLF | 23% Poorly correlated | -11.36% | ||
| SHGKY - AIFLF | 16% Poorly correlated | -7.14% | ||
| OPFI - AIFLF | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.96% | ||
| RBRI - AIFLF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCGFF - AIFLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CCGFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCGFF and OPFI have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCGFF and OPFI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCGFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCGFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OPFI - CCGFF | 2% Poorly correlated | +3.96% | ||
| ZIZTF - CCGFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIFLF - CCGFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DWAY - CCGFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHGKY - CCGFF | 0% Poorly correlated | -7.14% | ||
More | ||||