AIAGF
Price
$87.20
Change
+$1.71 (+2.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.88B
WOR
Price
$62.67
Change
-$0.54 (-0.85%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.15B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIAGF vs WOR

Header iconAIAGF vs WOR Comparison
Open Charts AIAGF vs WORBanner chart's image
Aurubis Ag
Price$87.20
Change+$1.71 (+2.00%)
Volume$3.77K
Capitalization4.88B
Worthington Enterprises
Price$62.67
Change-$0.54 (-0.85%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization3.15B
AIAGF vs WOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIAGF vs. WOR commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIAGF is a Hold and WOR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (AIAGF: $87.20 vs. WOR: $63.21)
Brand notoriety: AIAGF and WOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIAGF: 100% vs. WOR: 69%
Market capitalization -- AIAGF: $4.87B vs. WOR: $3.12B
AIAGF [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $4.87B. WOR’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WOR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOR is a better buy in the long-term than AIAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WOR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WOR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AIAGF (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WOR (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +2.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

WOR is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+3.15% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIAGF($4.88B) has a higher market cap than WOR($3.15B). WOR has higher P/E ratio than AIAGF: WOR (32.14) vs AIAGF (5.30). WOR YTD gains are higher at: 58.710 vs. AIAGF (10.365). AIAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. WOR (179M). AIAGF has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. WOR (250M). WOR has less debt than AIAGF: WOR (326M) vs AIAGF (579M). AIAGF has higher revenues than WOR: AIAGF (18.1B) vs WOR (1.15B).
AIAGFWORAIAGF / WOR
Capitalization4.88B3.15B155%
EBITDA1.16B179M650%
Gain YTD10.36558.71018%
P/E Ratio5.3032.1416%
Revenue18.1B1.15B1,568%
Total Cash490M250M196%
Total Debt579M326M178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIAGF vs WOR: Fundamental Ratings
AIAGF
WOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4328
SMR RATING
1..100
5567
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9195
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIAGF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as WOR (44) in the Steel industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AIAGF (43) in the null industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

AIAGF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as WOR (67) in the Steel industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AIAGF (53) in the null industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

AIAGF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WOR (95) in the Steel industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIAGFWOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GXLM39.236.48
+19.79%
Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM)
ETHU137.4812.45
+9.96%
2x Ether ETF
DSTL55.150.25
+0.46%
Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF
MIY11.300.03
+0.27%
Blackrock Muniyield Michigan Quality Fund
RIET9.40-0.05
-0.48%
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF

AIAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIAGF and MEC have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIAGF and MEC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIAGF
1D Price
Change %
AIAGF100%
N/A
MEC - AIAGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
TG - AIAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PRLB - AIAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
AIAGY - AIAGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOR - AIAGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

WOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOR has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOR jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOR
1D Price
Change %
WOR100%
-0.19%
MLI - WOR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
RYI - WOR
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
GFF - WOR
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
CODI - WOR
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
MATW - WOR
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More