Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSZX vs FSPHX
AHSZX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSZX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSZX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. AHSZX (65.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSZX: FSPHX (0.43) vs AHSZX (0.00). AHSZX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSZX (11 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). AHSZX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSZX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSZX (500000). AHSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. FSPHX (0.29). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.13 vs. AHSZX (-30.17).
| AHSZX | FSPHX | AHSZX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.63 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.63 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.041 | 0.809 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.7M | 6.28B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 0.29 | 3,452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.96 | 1.47 | 745% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.17 | -13.13 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.85 | 62.61 | 91% |