Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSZX vs FSPHX
AHSZX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSZX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSZX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. AHSZX (66.8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSZX: FSPHX (0.01) vs AHSZX (0.00). AHSZX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSZX (11 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSZX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSZX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSZX (500000). AHSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. FSPHX (-0.15). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -9.31 vs. AHSZX (-33.63).
| AHSZX | FSPHX | AHSZX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.63 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.63 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.873 | 12.550 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.8M | 6.67B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -0.15 | -3,354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.52 | 8.78 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.63 | -9.31 | 361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.04 | 43.45 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement