Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. AHSCX (65.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.43) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). AHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. FSPHX (0.29). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.13 vs. AHSCX (-41.66).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.63 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.63 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.934 | 0.809 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.7M | 6.28B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 0.29 | 2,996% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.15 | 1.47 | 486% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.66 | -13.13 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.85 | 62.61 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement