Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FBTAX
AHSCX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FBTAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Buy and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. AHSCX (66.5M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FBTAX (3.05) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: AHSCX (23 years) vs FBTAX (24 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FBTAX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.14 vs. AHSCX (-17.37). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.77 vs. AHSCX (-46.29).
| AHSCX | FBTAX | AHSCX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.96 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.96 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.033 | -2.573 | 429% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.5M | 1.28B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.37 | -7.14 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.13 | 45.29 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.29 | -8.77 | 528% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.67 | -6.12 | 763% |