Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FBTAX
AHSCX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FBTAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a StrongBuy and FBTAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. AHSCX (65.7M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FBTAX (1.17) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: AHSCX (24 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FBTAX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.12 vs. AHSCX (8.63). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.38 vs. AHSCX (-41.66).
| AHSCX | FBTAX | AHSCX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.96 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.96 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.934 | 2.751 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.7M | 1.87B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 42.12 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.15 | 60.53 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.66 | 12.38 | -336% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.85 | 122.13 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement