Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FBTAX
AHSCX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FBTAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Buy and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. AHSCX (65.8M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FBTAX (2.95) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: AHSCX (23 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FBTAX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.68 vs. AHSCX (-14.18). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -13.75 vs. AHSCX (-50.30).
| AHSCX | FBTAX | AHSCX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.96 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.96 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.485 | -1.213 | 865% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.8M | 1.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.18 | -5.68 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.84 | 28.75 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.30 | -13.75 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.40 | -8.19 | 579% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement