Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSAX vs FSPHX
AHSAX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSAX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSAX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. AHSAX (67.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSAX: FSPHX (0.01) vs AHSAX (0.00). AHSAX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSAX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSAX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSAX (1000). AHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.94 vs. FSPHX (4.50). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -2.50 vs. AHSAX (-28.97).
| AHSAX | FSPHX | AHSAX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.174 | 13.688 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.4M | 6.67B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | 4.50 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.96 | 12.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.97 | -2.50 | 1,159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.69 | 49.35 | 42% |