Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSAX vs FSPHX
AHSAX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSAX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSAX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. AHSAX (64.8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSAX (0.00). AHSAX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSAX (23 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSAX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSAX (1000). AHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.68 vs. FSPHX (-13.57). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.17 vs. AHSAX (-38.76).
| AHSAX | FSPHX | AHSAX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.874 | -3.119 | 252% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.8M | 5.74B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.68 | -13.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.47 | -7.12 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.76 | -15.17 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.60 | 10.69 | -239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement