Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSAX vs FSPHX
AHSAX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSAX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSAX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. AHSAX (64.3M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSAX (0.00). AHSAX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSAX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSAX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSAX (1000). AHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.43 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -12.12 vs. AHSAX (-37.31).
| AHSAX | FSPHX | AHSAX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.333 | 9.761 | 34% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.3M | 6.22B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.43 | -5.87 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.19 | 8.94 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.31 | -12.12 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.97 | 41.27 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement