AHODF
Price
$40.52
Change
+$0.38 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.56B
CPPCY
Price
$15.27
Change
+$1.47 (+10.65%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHODF vs CPPCY

Header iconAHODF vs CPPCY Comparison
Open Charts AHODF vs CPPCYBanner chart's image
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize
Price$40.52
Change+$0.38 (+0.95%)
Volume$881
Capitalization33.56B
CP All Public
Price$15.27
Change+$1.47 (+10.65%)
Volume$254
Capitalization16.64B
AHODF vs CPPCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AHODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHODF vs. CPPCY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHODF is a StrongBuy and CPPCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AHODF: $40.53 vs. CPPCY: $14.85)
Brand notoriety: AHODF and CPPCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHODF: 28% vs. CPPCY: 100%
Market capitalization -- AHODF: $33.56B vs. CPPCY: $16.64B
AHODF [@Food Retail] is valued at $33.56B. CPPCY’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $16.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCPPCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AHODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CPPCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AHODF is a better buy in the long-term than CPPCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHODF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPPCY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CPPCY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AHODF and CPPCY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AHODF (@Food Retail) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while CPPCY (@Food Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+2.22% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHODF($33.6B) has a higher market cap than CPPCY($16.6B). CPPCY has higher P/E ratio than AHODF: CPPCY (40.00) vs AHODF (11.92). AHODF YTD gains are higher at: 23.984 vs. CPPCY (-11.632). CPPCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.9B vs. AHODF (7.62B). CPPCY has more cash in the bank: 43.7B vs. AHODF (4.09B). AHODF has less debt than CPPCY: AHODF (4.49B) vs CPPCY (433B). CPPCY has higher revenues than AHODF: CPPCY (851B) vs AHODF (88.8B).
AHODFCPPCYAHODF / CPPCY
Capitalization33.6B16.6B202%
EBITDA7.62B74.9B10%
Gain YTD23.984-11.632-206%
P/E Ratio11.9240.0030%
Revenue88.8B851B10%
Total Cash4.09B43.7B9%
Total Debt4.49B433B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHODF vs CPPCY: Fundamental Ratings
AHODF
CPPCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
6242
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5376
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AHODF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPCY (25). This means that AHODF’s stock grew similarly to CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

AHODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPPCY (100). This means that AHODF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

CPPCY's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as AHODF (62). This means that CPPCY’s stock grew similarly to AHODF’s over the last 12 months.

AHODF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPCY (76). This means that AHODF’s stock grew similarly to CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

AHODF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPPCY (84). This means that AHODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHODFCPPCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEGH22.750.24
+1.07%
Legacy Housing Corp
UHS155.600.14
+0.09%
Universal Health Services
DRMA0.70N/A
-0.01%
Dermata Therapeutics Inc.
FCPT26.49-0.08
-0.30%
Four Corners Property Trust
CMTL2.27-0.03
-1.30%
Comtech Telecommunications Corp

AHODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHODF and ADRNY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHODF and ADRNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHODF
1D Price
Change %
AHODF100%
+0.93%
ADRNY - AHODF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
CRRFY - AHODF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
CRERF - AHODF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPPCY - AHODF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVPUF - AHODF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CPPCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPPCY and CUYTF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPPCY and CUYTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPPCY
1D Price
Change %
CPPCY100%
N/A
CUYTF - CPPCY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADRNY - CPPCY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
CRRFY - CPPCY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
CRERF - CPPCY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHODF - CPPCY
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More